YOU are applying his comment on a DISTRIBUTION to actual data.
(Darius) Not the first or the last to do so
(Darius) Not the first or the last to do so
Pathetic. You started thread, hence you carry can here.
YOU, not RJ.
(Darius) No sh*t? I hadn't noticed... my neither are you!
(Darius) No sh*t? I hadn't noticed... my neither are you!
Pathetic. You referenced RJ as making the error. Now sarcasm ... at yourself!?!
If he said "Strength follows bell curve, and I do not mean this in the commonly accepted statistical sense, but in some new weird sense you may make up yourself" then this would support your position. But he didn't, did he?
(Darius) Actually he did
(Darius) Actually he did
Pathetic. Now you must lie?.
You DON"T UNDERSTAND THE LANGUAGE. Why not learn it? Don't blame RJ.
(Darius) Why don't you contribute something useful to the discussion? OH you can't!
(Darius) Why don't you contribute something useful to the discussion? OH you can't!
Pathetic. My contribution is constructive because I am (trying to) prevent a major error developing on this site. I also care about fact that many (most?) people are so innumerate that they cannot understand figures in a newspaper. Which makes them vulnerable to exploitation, and a menace come elections. You are one of these people, Darius. You should be thankful! And you should be scrambling to get hold of a basic stats text.
I've been playing with some numbers since we've been having all of these OP strength debates
20/12/2009 06:34:05 PM
- 1259 Views
Few glaring errors...
20/12/2009 09:04:55 PM
- 844 Views
Re: Few glaring errors...
21/12/2009 07:52:18 AM
- 815 Views
You don't get it, do you...
21/12/2009 08:19:00 AM
- 747 Views
Didn't you claim that Eggy+Rom+Lel cannot match a male forsaken? Now they can match Lanfear?
21/12/2009 04:14:32 PM
- 633 Views
What you are missing is that
21/12/2009 06:46:04 PM
- 688 Views
I'm not missing it at all..
21/12/2009 06:58:04 PM
- 714 Views
Let's try matching that with the actual text
22/12/2009 03:01:36 PM
- 691 Views
Not correct...
22/12/2009 03:29:24 PM
- 781 Views
Believe as you like, I'm not here to convince you to otherwise, I'm stating how I read the evidence
22/12/2009 06:01:24 PM
- 680 Views
You're reading the evidence wrong.
22/12/2009 06:27:17 PM
- 661 Views
RJ also pointed out that Alivia's skill set as a weapon came in handy
22/12/2009 07:40:35 PM
- 619 Views
I thought a power law distribution is much more likely, TBH
20/12/2009 09:39:21 PM
- 741 Views
Yes. It essentially refers to a skewed histogram - biased to the lower end of the range...
20/12/2009 09:53:18 PM
- 780 Views
Corrections
21/12/2009 01:48:43 AM
- 794 Views
No...
21/12/2009 07:47:58 AM
- 685 Views
True, the application of this model is inconsistent *NM*
21/12/2009 02:34:26 PM
- 567 Views
Not if you point out that the average AS is not as strong as the overall average channeler
25/12/2009 04:30:17 AM
- 652 Views
yet RJ has said flat out that OP strength is on an Bell Curve. Meaning the majority of channelers
21/12/2009 07:36:22 AM
- 667 Views
Perhaps...
21/12/2009 07:52:13 AM
- 732 Views
I've always hated bell curves
21/12/2009 03:56:26 PM
- 683 Views
The most logical answer is that the average AOL channeler was stronger than the current average...
21/12/2009 06:36:07 PM
- 674 Views
and that in no way maps to any kind of Bell Curve
22/12/2009 06:02:41 PM
- 559 Views
Why?
22/12/2009 06:34:25 PM
- 689 Views
Can you provide the quote where RJ tells us the
22/12/2009 07:45:04 PM
- 605 Views
Always go back to the evidence...
22/12/2009 09:03:42 PM
- 761 Views
I'll respond when you can actually provide a few actual quotes to support any of this
23/12/2009 03:20:44 PM
- 674 Views
I've been looking into this a bit... and you really do overstate things to suit your arguments
24/12/2009 06:15:44 PM
- 695 Views
And in looking for quotes for another thread I came across this gem
29/12/2009 09:54:34 PM
- 667 Views
I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population
22/12/2009 08:35:23 PM
- 703 Views
Except that gateway size is used multiple times by characters to judge comparative strength...
22/12/2009 09:21:07 PM
- 704 Views
Re: Except that gateway size is used multiple times by characters to judge comparative strength...
22/12/2009 11:32:21 PM
- 797 Views
I agree that it's practically impossible to determine strength
23/12/2009 03:19:49 PM
- 694 Views
How convenient. And by the way, it is NOT tied to a Talent. Anyone who is strong enough, can Travel. *NM*
23/12/2009 04:36:24 PM
- 409 Views
Seriously go re-read the series, how can you have missed that Traveling is a Talent?
23/12/2009 04:54:51 PM
- 595 Views
It is a weave, the knowledge of which guarantees that you can use it, if you are strong enough...
23/12/2009 05:35:36 PM
- 680 Views
Yet every AS can Heal to a degree and Cloud Dancing involves weaves too
23/12/2009 05:41:42 PM
- 716 Views
Lews Therin can't Heal. Aginor can't Heal. If you don't have the Talent, you can't do it. *NM*
23/12/2009 05:52:02 PM
- 399 Views
LTT and Aginor have "Little Ability" with Healing
23/12/2009 06:02:13 PM
- 721 Views
Because the channelers THEMSELVES don't use Healing to judge each other's strength...
23/12/2009 06:06:58 PM
- 657 Views
The Channelers state that there is a minimum level of strength to make the Weave work
23/12/2009 06:11:55 PM
- 813 Views
No, it makes her 25% as strong as Rand! Thanks for proving my model to be virtually perfect!
23/12/2009 06:36:53 PM
- 635 Views
This is true, however...
23/12/2009 04:55:48 PM
- 721 Views
Aviendha's gateway size doesn't decrease. She is just less energy efficient in creating it...
23/12/2009 05:30:17 PM
- 956 Views
Aviendha is suffering from the second weave limitation
23/12/2009 05:37:45 PM
- 753 Views
Conceded. My faulty memory is to blame in this case. But it doesn't change the rule...
23/12/2009 06:01:33 PM
- 601 Views
I'll give you that there is a stength limitation to Traveling
23/12/2009 06:06:41 PM
- 640 Views
Why do the characters in the books judge each other's strength on gateway size then? *NM*
23/12/2009 06:08:17 PM
- 373 Views
Re: Why do the characters in the books judge each other's strength on gateway size then?
23/12/2009 06:20:18 PM
- 666 Views
And there you have it...Thank you.
23/12/2009 06:27:24 PM
- 651 Views
And linked with Romanda and Lelaine
23/12/2009 06:34:42 PM
- 641 Views
Sorry. That's pure speculation on your part. *NM*
23/12/2009 06:38:43 PM
- 383 Views
No more than yours is!
23/12/2009 06:49:57 PM
- 682 Views
Re: I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population
26/12/2009 12:38:43 PM
- 660 Views
Re: I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population *NM*
26/12/2009 12:41:01 PM
- 351 Views
Re: I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population
26/12/2009 06:37:50 PM
- 641 Views
Goodness
31/12/2009 03:37:23 AM
- 686 Views
I'm working within the context of what we've been told by the author
31/12/2009 03:43:31 AM
- 634 Views
No you are not
31/12/2009 03:58:28 AM
- 687 Views
Back to school AS, and you will be able to do this
26/12/2009 12:34:39 PM
- 614 Views
The problem we're working with is that RJ says strength follows a Bell Curve distribution
26/12/2009 03:29:26 PM
- 642 Views
And RJ knew his maths (and you don't)
31/12/2009 03:22:09 AM
- 689 Views
I'm not the one who said OP strength followed a Bell Curve Distribution
31/12/2009 03:34:55 AM
- 639 Views