Active Users:449 Time:28/12/2024 11:30:51 AM
Dude we're discussion works of fiction darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 31/12/2009 04:08:12 AM
here's what Wikipedia has to say about a Bell Curve

In probability theory and statistics, the normal distribution or Gaussian distribution is a continuous probability distribution that describes data that cluster around the mean. The graph of the associated probability density function is bell-shaped, with a peak at the mean, and is known as the Gaussian function or bell curve.

If you have a better theory put it out there instead of just sitting back telling the rest of us we are stupid... until then


You just don't get it, even when you cut and paste. Note key word in your quote: "describes".
The distribution describes the data.
(The distribution is not the data.)

Refer to the example I gave you earlier on IQs. This is an analogous concept.

You cannot take data from a FREQUENCY distribution and manipulate mathematically. IQ100 +IQ110 does not equal anything!

The FREQUENCY distribution is for prediction, validation etc.

Re stupidity, don't shoot the messenger Darius. Your initial mistake was neither here nor there. Your refusal to consider that you made a mistake is what is telling.


take a deep breath, we're not trying to save the friggin world. None of us have anywhere close to the data set necessary to map any of this information ... it's a hobby we like to play at ... the author claims his system maps to a Bell Curve distribution, the rest is 100% assumption, as I state in the original post by pointing out the information we have at hand, oh and the stuff that I was assuming. Your attitude that we must be 100% mathematically accurate is laughable, I don't think anyone takes this stuff that seriously!

Hurling insults on an internet forum just makes me think you need to get out more.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
I've been playing with some numbers since we've been having all of these OP strength debates - 20/12/2009 06:34:05 PM 1280 Views
There are 21 levels, not 100. More later. *NM* - 20/12/2009 07:23:18 PM 452 Views
RJ has said a number of times that the 21 level scale - 20/12/2009 07:35:25 PM 681 Views
Few glaring errors... - 20/12/2009 09:04:55 PM 865 Views
Re: Few glaring errors... - 21/12/2009 07:52:18 AM 836 Views
You don't get it, do you... - 21/12/2009 08:19:00 AM 766 Views
Didn't you claim that Eggy+Rom+Lel cannot match a male forsaken? Now they can match Lanfear? - 21/12/2009 04:14:32 PM 654 Views
That only strengthens my point. - 21/12/2009 06:23:39 PM 702 Views
No it does not. - 28/12/2009 02:45:42 AM 749 Views
What you are missing is that - 21/12/2009 06:46:04 PM 709 Views
I'm not missing it at all.. - 21/12/2009 06:58:04 PM 735 Views
Let's try matching that with the actual text - 22/12/2009 03:01:36 PM 707 Views
Not correct... - 22/12/2009 03:29:24 PM 800 Views
Believe as you like, I'm not here to convince you to otherwise, I'm stating how I read the evidence - 22/12/2009 06:01:24 PM 701 Views
You're reading the evidence wrong. - 22/12/2009 06:27:17 PM 687 Views
RJ also pointed out that Alivia's skill set as a weapon came in handy - 22/12/2009 07:40:35 PM 640 Views
I thought a power law distribution is much more likely, TBH - 20/12/2009 09:39:21 PM 764 Views
Yes. It essentially refers to a skewed histogram - biased to the lower end of the range... - 20/12/2009 09:53:18 PM 797 Views
Corrections - 21/12/2009 01:48:43 AM 815 Views
No... - 21/12/2009 07:47:58 AM 704 Views
True, the application of this model is inconsistent *NM* - 21/12/2009 02:34:26 PM 580 Views
yet RJ has said flat out that OP strength is on an Bell Curve. Meaning the majority of channelers - 21/12/2009 07:36:22 AM 688 Views
Perhaps... - 21/12/2009 07:52:13 AM 753 Views
I've always hated bell curves - 21/12/2009 03:56:26 PM 700 Views
The most logical answer is that the average AOL channeler was stronger than the current average... - 21/12/2009 06:36:07 PM 691 Views
and that in no way maps to any kind of Bell Curve - 22/12/2009 06:02:41 PM 577 Views
Why? - 22/12/2009 06:34:25 PM 709 Views
Can you provide the quote where RJ tells us the - 22/12/2009 07:45:04 PM 622 Views
Always go back to the evidence... - 22/12/2009 09:03:42 PM 783 Views
I'll respond when you can actually provide a few actual quotes to support any of this - 23/12/2009 03:20:44 PM 694 Views
Name an item you dispute and I will provide the quote.... - 23/12/2009 05:19:49 PM 668 Views
it's addressed below - 23/12/2009 05:23:58 PM 677 Views
I've been looking into this a bit... and you really do overstate things to suit your arguments - 24/12/2009 06:15:44 PM 716 Views
And in looking for quotes for another thread I came across this gem - 29/12/2009 09:54:34 PM 687 Views
Nice! It proves what I've been saying for ages... - 29/12/2009 10:13:41 PM 715 Views
Which is why I contend that they are about 80% of Lanfear - 29/12/2009 10:16:07 PM 681 Views
I wasn't trying to rip him a new one. - 22/12/2009 09:38:43 PM 612 Views
I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population - 22/12/2009 08:35:23 PM 724 Views
Except that gateway size is used multiple times by characters to judge comparative strength... - 22/12/2009 09:21:07 PM 720 Views
Re: Except that gateway size is used multiple times by characters to judge comparative strength... - 22/12/2009 11:32:21 PM 826 Views
I agree that it's practically impossible to determine strength - 23/12/2009 03:19:49 PM 711 Views
How convenient. And by the way, it is NOT tied to a Talent. Anyone who is strong enough, can Travel. *NM* - 23/12/2009 04:36:24 PM 419 Views
This is true, however... - 23/12/2009 04:55:48 PM 741 Views
Aviendha's gateway size doesn't decrease. She is just less energy efficient in creating it... - 23/12/2009 05:30:17 PM 983 Views
Aviendha is suffering from the second weave limitation - 23/12/2009 05:37:45 PM 770 Views
Conceded. My faulty memory is to blame in this case. But it doesn't change the rule... - 23/12/2009 06:01:33 PM 624 Views
I'll give you that there is a stength limitation to Traveling - 23/12/2009 06:06:41 PM 659 Views
Why do the characters in the books judge each other's strength on gateway size then? *NM* - 23/12/2009 06:08:17 PM 387 Views
Re: Why do the characters in the books judge each other's strength on gateway size then? - 23/12/2009 06:20:18 PM 681 Views
And there you have it...Thank you. - 23/12/2009 06:27:24 PM 668 Views
And linked with Romanda and Lelaine - 23/12/2009 06:34:42 PM 662 Views
Sorry. That's pure speculation on your part. *NM* - 23/12/2009 06:38:43 PM 395 Views
No more than yours is! - 23/12/2009 06:49:57 PM 698 Views
That entire passage is in the context of strength... - 23/12/2009 07:55:50 PM 606 Views
You need to re-read some of this stuff - 23/12/2009 11:01:15 PM 745 Views
Re: I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population - 26/12/2009 12:38:43 PM 680 Views
Re: I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population - 26/12/2009 06:37:50 PM 664 Views
Goodness - 31/12/2009 03:37:23 AM 703 Views
I'm working within the context of what we've been told by the author - 31/12/2009 03:43:31 AM 653 Views
Since you love Wiki so much - 31/12/2009 03:55:09 AM 666 Views
No you are not - 31/12/2009 03:58:28 AM 705 Views
Dude we're discussion works of fiction - 31/12/2009 04:08:12 AM 732 Views
Dumb Bell Distribution of Mongoloid Turings - 31/12/2009 04:36:50 AM 787 Views
Back to school AS, and you will be able to do this - 26/12/2009 12:34:39 PM 634 Views
The problem we're working with is that RJ says strength follows a Bell Curve distribution - 26/12/2009 03:29:26 PM 658 Views
And RJ knew his maths (and you don't) - 31/12/2009 03:22:09 AM 704 Views
I'm not the one who said OP strength followed a Bell Curve Distribution - 31/12/2009 03:34:55 AM 659 Views
You are the one who is MIS-USING his statement - 31/12/2009 03:44:26 AM 669 Views
- 31/12/2009 03:48:20 AM 963 Views
The pathos of Darius - 31/12/2009 04:26:15 AM 687 Views
Is Lanfear the strongest?(now) - 29/12/2009 12:46:13 AM 610 Views
Re: Is Lanfear the strongest?(now) - 29/12/2009 04:21:47 PM 672 Views

Reply to Message