I understand what RJ was trying to accomplish with CoT, but the fact is, the book did not advance the plot in any significant way. I can't help but wonder how closely he could have come to completing the series in his lifetime had he not experimented with the multi-pov witnessing of what had already happened in the previous book.
Can't bring myself to re-read tGS
- 23/12/2009 12:01:33 PM
1583 Views
I think pretty much alone, yes
- 23/12/2009 01:39:52 PM
957 Views
I'm sorry you feel that way. I thought Sanderson did an outstanding job. *NM*
- 23/12/2009 04:30:16 PM
544 Views
People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample
- 23/12/2009 07:01:48 PM
827 Views
Re: People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample
- 23/12/2009 10:34:15 PM
914 Views
*NM*
It was better than POD or COT if you ask me. It was as good as I could have asked for from BS *NM*
- 25/12/2009 12:10:51 AM
371 Views
OK, maybe the writting wasn't as good, but the story was better than the previous couple of books *NM*
- 29/12/2009 08:24:17 AM
316 Views
No, you're not. It was OK - I was more happy that the series seemed to be progressing
- 29/12/2009 03:43:59 PM
641 Views
Except for the Mat parts, it was fairly good.
- 30/12/2009 04:30:15 AM
672 Views
Yeah, CoT is one of the WoT books I don't even use as a reference. I try to forget it. *NM*
- 30/12/2009 03:53:25 PM
357 Views
It's kind of sad
- 31/12/2009 03:25:03 AM
694 Views
The Mat parts were the only places I was jarred by the difference in writing style
- 14/01/2010 03:12:58 PM
650 Views
Sorry, but I think Jordan was not writing all that well himself anymore
- 14/01/2010 09:19:07 AM
732 Views