Active Users:288 Time:19/04/2025 07:02:39 AM
Simply read the books and what the authors said... Etzel Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM
Normally you should understand then that the DO uses the TP for the Shadow. And if not, I hope that the last two books will finally provide enough clues for you, so that you manage to finally figure out, how the heck the DO does some things..

Seriously, to quote all things to you is simply too embarrassing. If you truly don't understand it yet (though I suppose you play a bit devil's advocate, because it actually isn't that complicated), I can only encourage you to re-read the series!
Reply to message
Fain's Myrddraal - 28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM 1847 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM* - 28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM 439 Views
except, of course, for Shaidar Haran *NM* - 28/12/2009 03:12:17 PM 448 Views
But what was the purpose then? - 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM 812 Views
To show the relationship between Fain and DO - 28/12/2009 03:52:59 PM 771 Views
Maybe... - 28/12/2009 04:02:42 PM 792 Views
Re: Maybe... - 29/12/2009 03:58:57 AM 1040 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal - 28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM 814 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand - 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM 820 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo - 28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM 732 Views
The explanations - 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM 995 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked - 28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM 915 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then - 28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM 1867 Views
I don't really have a strong opinion on which suspect did it - 28/12/2009 06:03:07 PM 736 Views
Well... - 28/12/2009 06:42:16 PM 787 Views
Indeed *NM* - 28/12/2009 06:55:52 PM 394 Views
Re: The explanations - 28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM 671 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... - 28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM 771 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... - 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM 835 Views
The reason is... - 29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM 818 Views
The reasoning is very weak. - 29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM 811 Views
If you mean... - 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM 886 Views
A few points - 29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM 741 Views
You are wrong... - 29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM 729 Views
Thanks for the quote .. obviously hadn't heard that one before! - 29/12/2009 04:31:37 PM 831 Views
Key word - "possibly" - 29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM 743 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. - 29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM 708 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. - 29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM 639 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad. - 29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM 718 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts" - 29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM 641 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV - 29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM 686 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit - 29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM 729 Views
You confuse it a bit... - 29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM 793 Views
I think you've got it backwards - 29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM 685 Views
However... - 29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM 728 Views
I wasn't arguing that point - 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM 950 Views
Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear... *NM* - 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM 682 Views
clearly they do since people are discussing it! - 29/12/2009 09:37:00 PM 664 Views
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP. - 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM 725 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense - 29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM 818 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections! - 29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM 777 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said... - 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM 730 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case. - 29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM 700 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like... - 29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM 807 Views
Because the Dark One is not merely a super channeler. - 29/12/2009 07:21:21 PM 827 Views
Well, I disagree of course... - 29/12/2009 07:36:19 PM 946 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts. - 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM 890 Views
Actually... - 29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM 793 Views
BWB says... - 29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM 1025 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 29/12/2009 06:12:30 PM 365 Views
Well... - 29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM 837 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins - 29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM 741 Views
No... - 29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM 931 Views
Re: No... - 29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM 905 Views
Again... - 29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM 666 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen? - 29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM 698 Views
Again... - 29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM 639 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it. - 29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM 739 Views
Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. - 29/12/2009 08:16:50 PM 610 Views
Re: Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. - 29/12/2009 09:21:23 PM 706 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM* - 29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM 376 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh* - 29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM 589 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it? - 29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM 819 Views
I don't say... - 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM 889 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC - 30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM 795 Views
Re: Well... - 29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM 710 Views
It becomes clear... - 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM 641 Views
Basically, you think Slayer killed him. I do not. Nor do I care. - 29/12/2009 07:04:20 PM 623 Views
Fair enough. *NM* - 29/12/2009 07:17:22 PM 429 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand - 28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM 888 Views
As said... - 28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM 716 Views
Re: As said... - 28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM 716 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman... - 28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM 686 Views
makes you wonder - 28/12/2009 09:45:08 PM 741 Views
Re: makes you wonder - 28/12/2009 10:16:57 PM 766 Views
I think... - 29/12/2009 12:03:41 PM 683 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM* - 29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM 432 Views
It is quite obvious that it was Mistress Laras. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:35:36 PM 395 Views
Intuitively, even. *NM* - 29/12/2009 06:03:13 PM 391 Views

Reply to Message