Active Users:978 Time:23/11/2024 11:21:06 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Maybe... Bonden Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 03:58:57 AM
Although we still don't know, what exactly the deal was the Myrddraal had to make with Fain (Fain calls it "the matter of agreements and accord" and the explanation makes the Myrddraal sweat), or what happened with the Fain's Myrddraal after LoC. At least this should be revealed at some point, IMO.


Nah, the point is to show even though the reverse polarity of the two "evil" powers destroys each other they can still pull eachother in and work together. Basically Rand's wound, think about what it's been doing and how it'll dawn on Rand what to do.

I think that'll be part of what happens to the DO in the end, the True Source simply blocks the DO from the world via the Pattern, the Mordeth power actually interacts and destroys the TP (The Cleansing).

The fact that BS has said that Fain is working outside the Pattern's will is just more proof he will do something the Pattern doesn't will (upsetting the Order vs Destruction balance).

Edit: Just like Mashadar has been said to be a fungus grown from the Taint (Dark One, TP), Mashadar is attracted to Mordeth, they destroy eachother yet they attract eachother. Mashadar is just a biproduct of the Taint, not the straight power.
This message last edited by Bonden on 29/12/2009 at 04:07:28 AM
Reply to message
Fain's Myrddraal Etzel - 28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM 1768 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM* Lordling - 28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM 407 Views
except, of course, for Shaidar Haran *NM* darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 03:12:17 PM 415 Views
But what was the purpose then? Etzel - 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM 748 Views
To show the relationship between Fain and DO Bonden - 28/12/2009 03:52:59 PM 701 Views
Maybe... Etzel - 28/12/2009 04:02:42 PM 705 Views
Re: Maybe... Bonden - 29/12/2009 03:58:57 AM 958 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM 736 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand Etzel - 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM 745 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM 656 Views
The explanations Etzel - 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM 926 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM 844 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then Etzel - 28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM 1789 Views
I don't really have a strong opinion on which suspect did it darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 06:03:07 PM 658 Views
Well... Etzel - 28/12/2009 06:42:16 PM 725 Views
Indeed *NM* darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 06:55:52 PM 365 Views
Re: The explanations RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM 599 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... Etzel - 28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM 676 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM 765 Views
The reason is... Etzel - 29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM 745 Views
The reasoning is very weak. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM 728 Views
If you mean... Etzel - 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM 806 Views
A few points darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM 666 Views
You are wrong... Etzel - 29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM 659 Views
Thanks for the quote .. obviously hadn't heard that one before! darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 04:31:37 PM 752 Views
Key word - "possibly" RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM 658 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. Etzel - 29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM 638 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM 595 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad. Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM 639 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts" darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM 565 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM 590 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM 655 Views
You confuse it a bit... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM 715 Views
I think you've got it backwards darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM 613 Views
However... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM 655 Views
I wasn't arguing that point darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM 876 Views
Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear... *NM* Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM 601 Views
clearly they do since people are discussing it! darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 09:37:00 PM 588 Views
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM 653 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM 740 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections! RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM 704 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM 653 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM 615 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM 739 Views
Because the Dark One is not merely a super channeler. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:21:21 PM 744 Views
Well, I disagree of course... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:36:19 PM 863 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM 816 Views
Actually... Etzel - 29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM 726 Views
BWB says... darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM 958 Views
Exactly. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:12:30 PM 335 Views
Well... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM 763 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM 665 Views
No... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM 850 Views
Re: No... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM 833 Views
Again... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM 597 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM 625 Views
Again... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM 569 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM 655 Views
Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:16:50 PM 535 Views
Re: Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 09:21:23 PM 627 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM* darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM 345 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh* Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM 545 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it? darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM 741 Views
I don't say... Etzel - 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM 798 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC darius_sedai - 30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM 715 Views
Re: Well... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM 631 Views
It becomes clear... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM 562 Views
Basically, you think Slayer killed him. I do not. Nor do I care. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:04:20 PM 544 Views
Fair enough. *NM* Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:17:22 PM 397 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM 810 Views
As said... Etzel - 28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM 642 Views
Re: As said... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM 637 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman... Etzel - 28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM 620 Views
makes you wonder darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 09:45:08 PM 664 Views
Re: makes you wonder RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 10:16:57 PM 696 Views
I think... Etzel - 29/12/2009 12:03:41 PM 614 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM* aldapelan - 29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM 397 Views
It is quite obvious that it was Mistress Laras. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 03:35:36 PM 365 Views
Intuitively, even. *NM* Gher - 29/12/2009 06:03:13 PM 360 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes