Active Users:398 Time:27/10/2025 03:04:32 AM
It could well fly Mysteria Indictus Send a noteboard - 24/12/2009 10:23:37 AM
Lanfear was a OP researcher, Mesaana was an instructor, and Demandred is second only to LTT, surely one of them has the knowledge, or at least enough to figure it out.


Lanfear was an OP researcher, true, but I always assumed that the sa'angreal technology - possibly unlike that of the ter'angreal - had been around for a while and that any angreal or sa'angreal the researchers might need in their work could have been manufactured by other Aes Sedai specialized in that area.

Mesaana was an instructor, true, but that does not mean she had to know everything about the OP. Think about university teachers of today. Just because you know everything about linguistics or history doesn't mean that you have to know squat about math. And Mesaana wanted to do research, which could mean that her area of expertise was closer to that of Lanfear, which if so did not include *angreal making.

Demandred was second only to Lews Therin, sure, but what would that prove? Can a vice president - as I said above - always build a space shuttle?

And by the way, Aginor and Balthamel were also academics. Only their areas we know (almost) for sure had nothing to do with *angreal making.
//Mysteria Indictus
Previously known as NightShade
Gleeman of the Page of Legends
Reply to message
Callandor - 22/12/2009 12:52:43 PM 1630 Views
I think because it's smaller... - 22/12/2009 02:10:57 PM 981 Views
Re: I think because it's smaller... - 22/12/2009 05:40:28 PM 1132 Views
RJ on Callandor and its flaw - 22/12/2009 02:49:11 PM 1412 Views
Damn you for stealing my thunder! *NM* - 22/12/2009 02:53:41 PM 479 Views
Always a pleasure! *NM* - 22/12/2009 02:58:29 PM 438 Views
I'm gonna have to be faster on the trigger with you around... - 22/12/2009 03:01:04 PM 827 Views
I use the Theoryland database. *NM* - 22/12/2009 05:03:06 PM 433 Views
It's always strange to me how despite mass production of angreal and sa'angreal no Forsaken had one - 22/12/2009 09:15:27 PM 839 Views
The only logical answer... - 22/12/2009 10:07:40 PM 952 Views
Stacking up power - 23/12/2009 10:46:46 AM 830 Views
Ummm, why would they seal and ward a flawed sa'angreal in the Stone...? - 22/12/2009 11:42:03 PM 824 Views
Prophecy *NM* - 23/12/2009 12:43:59 AM 461 Views
Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 02:53:23 PM 1078 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 05:00:29 PM 899 Views
The Nazi's did have that weapon. - 22/12/2009 05:46:41 PM 1188 Views
Re: The Nazi's did have that weapon. - 22/12/2009 06:54:05 PM 892 Views
Where does it say LTT used it? - 22/12/2009 07:29:02 PM 945 Views
I seem to recall... - 22/12/2009 07:40:36 PM 830 Views
Re: I seem to recall... - 22/12/2009 11:11:53 PM 827 Views
Re: I seem to recall... - 23/12/2009 03:13:50 PM 878 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 07:32:53 PM 826 Views
That seems to be just his paranoia talking *NM* - 22/12/2009 07:48:11 PM 420 Views
While I agree... - 22/12/2009 08:11:27 PM 841 Views
How funny is it that they're mass-producing crystalline swords and humanoid statuettes? - 22/12/2009 09:18:33 PM 870 Views
I had a theory... - 22/12/2009 09:25:57 PM 928 Views
Since they were mass produced, I reckon each Forsaken probably had a personal sa'angreal... - 22/12/2009 09:49:14 PM 816 Views
*oops* - 23/12/2009 05:45:32 PM 772 Views
What if I wanted to keep it on my coffee table?? - 23/12/2009 03:57:45 AM 869 Views
Don't forget sa'angreal the size of the Colossus of Rhodes *NM* - 23/12/2009 05:43:10 PM 851 Views
Re: Callandor - 22/12/2009 11:09:26 PM 990 Views
Perhaps a - 23/12/2009 06:23:21 AM 850 Views
Re: Callandor - 23/12/2009 11:07:20 AM 792 Views
That doesn't really fly... - 23/12/2009 03:24:11 PM 843 Views
It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal. - 23/12/2009 05:53:09 PM 933 Views
Re: It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal. - 23/12/2009 06:54:49 PM 776 Views
It could well fly - 24/12/2009 10:23:37 AM 887 Views

Reply to Message