Active Users:586 Time:26/11/2024 08:15:41 PM
It could well fly Mysteria Indictus Send a noteboard - 24/12/2009 10:23:37 AM
Lanfear was a OP researcher, Mesaana was an instructor, and Demandred is second only to LTT, surely one of them has the knowledge, or at least enough to figure it out.


Lanfear was an OP researcher, true, but I always assumed that the sa'angreal technology - possibly unlike that of the ter'angreal - had been around for a while and that any angreal or sa'angreal the researchers might need in their work could have been manufactured by other Aes Sedai specialized in that area.

Mesaana was an instructor, true, but that does not mean she had to know everything about the OP. Think about university teachers of today. Just because you know everything about linguistics or history doesn't mean that you have to know squat about math. And Mesaana wanted to do research, which could mean that her area of expertise was closer to that of Lanfear, which if so did not include *angreal making.

Demandred was second only to Lews Therin, sure, but what would that prove? Can a vice president - as I said above - always build a space shuttle?

And by the way, Aginor and Balthamel were also academics. Only their areas we know (almost) for sure had nothing to do with *angreal making.
//Mysteria Indictus
Previously known as NightShade
Gleeman of the Page of Legends
Reply to message
Callandor - 22/12/2009 12:52:43 PM 1451 Views
I think because it's smaller... - 22/12/2009 02:10:57 PM 802 Views
Re: I think because it's smaller... - 22/12/2009 05:40:28 PM 933 Views
RJ on Callandor and its flaw - 22/12/2009 02:49:11 PM 1206 Views
Damn you for stealing my thunder! *NM* - 22/12/2009 02:53:41 PM 392 Views
Always a pleasure! *NM* - 22/12/2009 02:58:29 PM 358 Views
I'm gonna have to be faster on the trigger with you around... - 22/12/2009 03:01:04 PM 650 Views
I use the Theoryland database. *NM* - 22/12/2009 05:03:06 PM 346 Views
It's always strange to me how despite mass production of angreal and sa'angreal no Forsaken had one - 22/12/2009 09:15:27 PM 662 Views
The only logical answer... - 22/12/2009 10:07:40 PM 764 Views
Stacking up power - 23/12/2009 10:46:46 AM 653 Views
Ummm, why would they seal and ward a flawed sa'angreal in the Stone...? - 22/12/2009 11:42:03 PM 645 Views
Prophecy *NM* - 23/12/2009 12:43:59 AM 380 Views
Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 02:53:23 PM 896 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 05:00:29 PM 716 Views
The Nazi's did have that weapon. - 22/12/2009 05:46:41 PM 976 Views
Re: The Nazi's did have that weapon. - 22/12/2009 06:54:05 PM 690 Views
Where does it say LTT used it? - 22/12/2009 07:29:02 PM 792 Views
I seem to recall... - 22/12/2009 07:40:36 PM 651 Views
Re: I seem to recall... - 22/12/2009 11:11:53 PM 644 Views
Re: I seem to recall... - 23/12/2009 03:13:50 PM 698 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 07:32:53 PM 638 Views
That seems to be just his paranoia talking *NM* - 22/12/2009 07:48:11 PM 336 Views
While I agree... - 22/12/2009 08:11:27 PM 663 Views
How funny is it that they're mass-producing crystalline swords and humanoid statuettes? - 22/12/2009 09:18:33 PM 658 Views
I had a theory... - 22/12/2009 09:25:57 PM 733 Views
Since they were mass produced, I reckon each Forsaken probably had a personal sa'angreal... - 22/12/2009 09:49:14 PM 636 Views
*oops* - 23/12/2009 05:45:32 PM 591 Views
What if I wanted to keep it on my coffee table?? - 23/12/2009 03:57:45 AM 673 Views
Don't forget sa'angreal the size of the Colossus of Rhodes *NM* - 23/12/2009 05:43:10 PM 661 Views
Re: Callandor - 22/12/2009 11:09:26 PM 779 Views
Perhaps a - 23/12/2009 06:23:21 AM 669 Views
Re: Callandor - 23/12/2009 11:07:20 AM 625 Views
That doesn't really fly... - 23/12/2009 03:24:11 PM 652 Views
It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal. - 23/12/2009 05:53:09 PM 752 Views
Re: It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal. - 23/12/2009 06:54:49 PM 588 Views
It could well fly - 24/12/2009 10:23:37 AM 716 Views

Reply to Message