I dont know if it's my first favorite or second favorite *NM*
Nargs Send a noteboard - 23/12/2009 04:07:53 PM
Brandon Sanderson is not Robert Jordan. Those who are disgruntled seem to fail to realize that no matter how hard one tries, there are going to be differences.
Can't bring myself to re-read tGS
23/12/2009 12:01:33 PM
- 1583 Views
I think pretty much alone, yes
23/12/2009 01:39:52 PM
- 957 Views
I have to agree...it was very enjoyable
23/12/2009 01:48:39 PM
- 891 Views
I dont know if it's my first favorite or second favorite *NM*
23/12/2009 04:07:53 PM
- 362 Views
I'm sorry you feel that way. I thought Sanderson did an outstanding job. *NM*
23/12/2009 04:30:16 PM
- 544 Views
People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample
23/12/2009 07:01:48 PM
- 827 Views
Re: People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample
23/12/2009 10:34:15 PM
- 914 Views
It was better than POD or COT if you ask me. It was as good as I could have asked for from BS *NM*
25/12/2009 12:10:51 AM
- 371 Views
OK, maybe the writting wasn't as good, but the story was better than the previous couple of books *NM*
29/12/2009 08:24:17 AM
- 316 Views
No, you're not. It was OK - I was more happy that the series seemed to be progressing
29/12/2009 03:43:59 PM
- 641 Views
Except for the Mat parts, it was fairly good.
30/12/2009 04:30:15 AM
- 672 Views
Yeah, CoT is one of the WoT books I don't even use as a reference. I try to forget it. *NM*
30/12/2009 03:53:25 PM
- 357 Views
The Mat parts were the only places I was jarred by the difference in writing style
14/01/2010 03:12:58 PM
- 650 Views
Sorry, but I think Jordan was not writing all that well himself anymore
14/01/2010 09:19:07 AM
- 732 Views