Brandon Sanderson is not Robert Jordan. Those who are disgruntled seem to fail to realize that no matter how hard one tries, there are going to be differences.
The past is just that, the past. You can only truly live by looking to the future!
Can't bring myself to re-read tGS
23/12/2009 12:01:33 PM
- 1629 Views
I think pretty much alone, yes
23/12/2009 01:39:52 PM
- 994 Views
I have to agree...it was very enjoyable
23/12/2009 01:48:39 PM
- 935 Views
I'm sorry you feel that way. I thought Sanderson did an outstanding job. *NM*
23/12/2009 04:30:16 PM
- 563 Views
People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample
23/12/2009 07:01:48 PM
- 869 Views
Re: People who post on WOT messageboards do not comprise a reprsentative sample
23/12/2009 10:34:15 PM
- 961 Views
It was better than POD or COT if you ask me. It was as good as I could have asked for from BS *NM*
25/12/2009 12:10:51 AM
- 391 Views
OK, maybe the writting wasn't as good, but the story was better than the previous couple of books *NM*
29/12/2009 08:24:17 AM
- 338 Views
No, you're not. It was OK - I was more happy that the series seemed to be progressing
29/12/2009 03:43:59 PM
- 686 Views
Except for the Mat parts, it was fairly good.
30/12/2009 04:30:15 AM
- 717 Views
Yeah, CoT is one of the WoT books I don't even use as a reference. I try to forget it. *NM*
30/12/2009 03:53:25 PM
- 378 Views
The Mat parts were the only places I was jarred by the difference in writing style
14/01/2010 03:12:58 PM
- 695 Views
Sorry, but I think Jordan was not writing all that well himself anymore
14/01/2010 09:19:07 AM
- 775 Views