Active Users:1143 Time:23/11/2024 04:02:09 AM
The only logical answer... Shannow Send a noteboard - 22/12/2009 10:07:40 PM
I would think this would be the sort of item you would keep on yourself at all times, even when reporting to the Bore to visit the Dark One; with the commands and punishments for using the Power there, only the most idiotic Forsaken would try and rid themseves of an opponent within range of that area.



...other than the obvious one, which is that it is another RJ plotconvenience, is that the Dark One, being a paranoid SoB in RJ's words, would view the potential threat of any angreal as a reason to suspect you of treachery. And take you out in a kind of pre-emptive strike, so to speak.

Otherwise I'd have suspected the Forsaken to not only carry the strongest possible sa'angreal in their posesssion, but since they evidently stack up as shown by Rand in Rhuidean, to wear the strongest ring sa'angreal, together with the strongest waistband sa'angreal, together with the strongest neckchain sa'angreal, together with the strongest wristband sa'angreal etc. etc.

In fact, I'd expect each Forsaken to be so weighted down by various ornamental sa'angreal, that they'd struggle to walk up the path to Shayol Ghul. Personally, I find it unconvincing that angreal and sa'angreal can stack their power. For the very reason that channelers should then have worn the maximum amount possible, to the extent that they remain seated in their wagon, or rather, lying outstretched to touch as much of their pile of sa'angreal as they can at any one time.

Think Scrooge Mcduck diving into his pile of gold. Same thing with Demandred and his pile of sa'angreal. Touch as many as you can with various bodily extremities in order to channel a little more than Sammael, who can touch fewer sa'angreal at once due to his shorter stature.

Hmmm. No wonder the tall guys were so powerful...
Reply to message
Callandor - 22/12/2009 12:52:43 PM 1445 Views
I think because it's smaller... - 22/12/2009 02:10:57 PM 796 Views
Re: I think because it's smaller... - 22/12/2009 05:40:28 PM 928 Views
RJ on Callandor and its flaw - 22/12/2009 02:49:11 PM 1200 Views
Damn you for stealing my thunder! *NM* - 22/12/2009 02:53:41 PM 391 Views
Always a pleasure! *NM* - 22/12/2009 02:58:29 PM 356 Views
I'm gonna have to be faster on the trigger with you around... - 22/12/2009 03:01:04 PM 644 Views
I use the Theoryland database. *NM* - 22/12/2009 05:03:06 PM 344 Views
It's always strange to me how despite mass production of angreal and sa'angreal no Forsaken had one - 22/12/2009 09:15:27 PM 655 Views
The only logical answer... - 22/12/2009 10:07:40 PM 759 Views
Stacking up power - 23/12/2009 10:46:46 AM 649 Views
Ummm, why would they seal and ward a flawed sa'angreal in the Stone...? - 22/12/2009 11:42:03 PM 640 Views
Prophecy *NM* - 23/12/2009 12:43:59 AM 379 Views
Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 02:53:23 PM 891 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 05:00:29 PM 711 Views
The Nazi's did have that weapon. - 22/12/2009 05:46:41 PM 971 Views
Re: The Nazi's did have that weapon. - 22/12/2009 06:54:05 PM 684 Views
Where does it say LTT used it? - 22/12/2009 07:29:02 PM 786 Views
I seem to recall... - 22/12/2009 07:40:36 PM 646 Views
Re: I seem to recall... - 22/12/2009 11:11:53 PM 637 Views
Re: I seem to recall... - 23/12/2009 03:13:50 PM 692 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 07:32:53 PM 631 Views
That seems to be just his paranoia talking *NM* - 22/12/2009 07:48:11 PM 335 Views
While I agree... - 22/12/2009 08:11:27 PM 657 Views
How funny is it that they're mass-producing crystalline swords and humanoid statuettes? - 22/12/2009 09:18:33 PM 655 Views
I had a theory... - 22/12/2009 09:25:57 PM 728 Views
Since they were mass produced, I reckon each Forsaken probably had a personal sa'angreal... - 22/12/2009 09:49:14 PM 630 Views
*oops* - 23/12/2009 05:45:32 PM 584 Views
What if I wanted to keep it on my coffee table?? - 23/12/2009 03:57:45 AM 666 Views
Don't forget sa'angreal the size of the Colossus of Rhodes *NM* - 23/12/2009 05:43:10 PM 655 Views
Re: Callandor - 22/12/2009 11:09:26 PM 775 Views
Perhaps a - 23/12/2009 06:23:21 AM 663 Views
Re: Callandor - 23/12/2009 11:07:20 AM 621 Views
That doesn't really fly... - 23/12/2009 03:24:11 PM 649 Views
It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal. - 23/12/2009 05:53:09 PM 749 Views
Re: It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal. - 23/12/2009 06:54:49 PM 586 Views
It could well fly - 24/12/2009 10:23:37 AM 712 Views

Reply to Message