Active Users:430 Time:28/12/2024 11:22:20 AM
RJ also pointed out that Alivia's skill set as a weapon came in handy darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 22/12/2009 07:40:35 PM
How much can 6 foot 6 man weigh? Do you think either Rand or Lan could possibly weigh more than 225lbs? According to the national heart institute a healthy man of 6 feet 6 inches should weigh in at less than 215lbs to have an acceptable BMI. Assuming Rand and Lan are more muscular than average that still won't put them over 230lbs, and probably less as swordsmanship would be difficult for a man who was too bulky.

As for Sea folk, even assuming they are tiny, let's say 5'2" the NHI says 125lbs is about right... so no I'm not completely guessing at this. Unless you think Rand and Lan are both freakishly overweight and the WF insanely tiny.

Lanfear vs. Egwene's circle... they both all female so E/R/L would be stronger regardless and be of similar dexterity. Lanfear would likely still kick their butts as she managed Alivia with angreal who would have been even stronger than that circle of 3! I don't see why people seem to forget that Cyndane wiped the floor with a woman who must have been at least 2x stronger than she was simply because she was more skilled.

You have no basis or proof that Egwene is "much weaker" than Nynaeve, RJ himself has stated that level to be "one step below" Forsaken strength! If one step below = 50% as strong that's one hell of a step!


I've shown it to you countless times, but you refuse to accept the facts. Alivia is a poor example, because RJ himself said that Lanfear only matched her because Alivia has so little knowledge of the Power. A male Forsaken would not have that handicap.

I come back to the simple comparison. Lanfear has to be AT LEAST of similar strength to Egwene, Lelaine and Romanda combined. Because it all comes down to EFFECTIVE strength. And Lanfear's EFFECTIVE strength, has to match the effective strength of a male Forsaken, which must AT LEAST match the effective strength of Egwene's circle.

That fits the evidence. Your inflated model does not.


Lanfear knows more about the power than Egwene and her circle could hope too. What you are saying here is that Lanfear would have to be equal or better to take out a stronger modern day opponent. That's ridiculous. They are like children in comparison, note that not one of the Forsaken has ever shown fear from strength alone... Cyndane noted Alivia's strength, knew she had ter'angreal as well as an angreal and her first thought was that she may still be able to take down a woman likely more than 2x, probably even 3x or 4x, stronger whom the weaves could not directly touch! If they needed to be close to equal to face off Cyndane would have given a big girly scream and Traveled out of the vicinity immediately.

Quit screaming about effectiveness, there is more to the OP than strength/dexterity. And I still haven't seen a quote or an example from the text showing Egwene to be any weaker than 85% of Nynaeve. Where is this phantom evidence that Egwene is only an "Average level" woman? Quantify your argument if you can.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
I've been playing with some numbers since we've been having all of these OP strength debates - 20/12/2009 06:34:05 PM 1280 Views
There are 21 levels, not 100. More later. *NM* - 20/12/2009 07:23:18 PM 452 Views
RJ has said a number of times that the 21 level scale - 20/12/2009 07:35:25 PM 681 Views
Few glaring errors... - 20/12/2009 09:04:55 PM 865 Views
Re: Few glaring errors... - 21/12/2009 07:52:18 AM 836 Views
You don't get it, do you... - 21/12/2009 08:19:00 AM 766 Views
Didn't you claim that Eggy+Rom+Lel cannot match a male forsaken? Now they can match Lanfear? - 21/12/2009 04:14:32 PM 654 Views
That only strengthens my point. - 21/12/2009 06:23:39 PM 702 Views
No it does not. - 28/12/2009 02:45:42 AM 749 Views
What you are missing is that - 21/12/2009 06:46:04 PM 709 Views
I'm not missing it at all.. - 21/12/2009 06:58:04 PM 735 Views
Let's try matching that with the actual text - 22/12/2009 03:01:36 PM 707 Views
Not correct... - 22/12/2009 03:29:24 PM 800 Views
Believe as you like, I'm not here to convince you to otherwise, I'm stating how I read the evidence - 22/12/2009 06:01:24 PM 700 Views
You're reading the evidence wrong. - 22/12/2009 06:27:17 PM 687 Views
RJ also pointed out that Alivia's skill set as a weapon came in handy - 22/12/2009 07:40:35 PM 640 Views
I thought a power law distribution is much more likely, TBH - 20/12/2009 09:39:21 PM 764 Views
Yes. It essentially refers to a skewed histogram - biased to the lower end of the range... - 20/12/2009 09:53:18 PM 797 Views
Corrections - 21/12/2009 01:48:43 AM 815 Views
No... - 21/12/2009 07:47:58 AM 704 Views
True, the application of this model is inconsistent *NM* - 21/12/2009 02:34:26 PM 580 Views
yet RJ has said flat out that OP strength is on an Bell Curve. Meaning the majority of channelers - 21/12/2009 07:36:22 AM 688 Views
Perhaps... - 21/12/2009 07:52:13 AM 753 Views
I've always hated bell curves - 21/12/2009 03:56:26 PM 700 Views
The most logical answer is that the average AOL channeler was stronger than the current average... - 21/12/2009 06:36:07 PM 691 Views
and that in no way maps to any kind of Bell Curve - 22/12/2009 06:02:41 PM 577 Views
Why? - 22/12/2009 06:34:25 PM 709 Views
Can you provide the quote where RJ tells us the - 22/12/2009 07:45:04 PM 622 Views
Always go back to the evidence... - 22/12/2009 09:03:42 PM 783 Views
I'll respond when you can actually provide a few actual quotes to support any of this - 23/12/2009 03:20:44 PM 694 Views
Name an item you dispute and I will provide the quote.... - 23/12/2009 05:19:49 PM 668 Views
it's addressed below - 23/12/2009 05:23:58 PM 677 Views
I've been looking into this a bit... and you really do overstate things to suit your arguments - 24/12/2009 06:15:44 PM 716 Views
And in looking for quotes for another thread I came across this gem - 29/12/2009 09:54:34 PM 687 Views
Nice! It proves what I've been saying for ages... - 29/12/2009 10:13:41 PM 715 Views
Which is why I contend that they are about 80% of Lanfear - 29/12/2009 10:16:07 PM 681 Views
I wasn't trying to rip him a new one. - 22/12/2009 09:38:43 PM 612 Views
I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population - 22/12/2009 08:35:23 PM 724 Views
Except that gateway size is used multiple times by characters to judge comparative strength... - 22/12/2009 09:21:07 PM 720 Views
Re: Except that gateway size is used multiple times by characters to judge comparative strength... - 22/12/2009 11:32:21 PM 826 Views
I agree that it's practically impossible to determine strength - 23/12/2009 03:19:49 PM 711 Views
How convenient. And by the way, it is NOT tied to a Talent. Anyone who is strong enough, can Travel. *NM* - 23/12/2009 04:36:24 PM 419 Views
This is true, however... - 23/12/2009 04:55:48 PM 741 Views
Aviendha's gateway size doesn't decrease. She is just less energy efficient in creating it... - 23/12/2009 05:30:17 PM 983 Views
Aviendha is suffering from the second weave limitation - 23/12/2009 05:37:45 PM 769 Views
Conceded. My faulty memory is to blame in this case. But it doesn't change the rule... - 23/12/2009 06:01:33 PM 623 Views
I'll give you that there is a stength limitation to Traveling - 23/12/2009 06:06:41 PM 659 Views
Why do the characters in the books judge each other's strength on gateway size then? *NM* - 23/12/2009 06:08:17 PM 387 Views
Re: Why do the characters in the books judge each other's strength on gateway size then? - 23/12/2009 06:20:18 PM 681 Views
And there you have it...Thank you. - 23/12/2009 06:27:24 PM 668 Views
And linked with Romanda and Lelaine - 23/12/2009 06:34:42 PM 662 Views
Sorry. That's pure speculation on your part. *NM* - 23/12/2009 06:38:43 PM 395 Views
No more than yours is! - 23/12/2009 06:49:57 PM 698 Views
That entire passage is in the context of strength... - 23/12/2009 07:55:50 PM 606 Views
You need to re-read some of this stuff - 23/12/2009 11:01:15 PM 745 Views
Re: I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population - 26/12/2009 12:38:43 PM 680 Views
Re: I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population - 26/12/2009 06:37:50 PM 664 Views
Goodness - 31/12/2009 03:37:23 AM 703 Views
I'm working within the context of what we've been told by the author - 31/12/2009 03:43:31 AM 653 Views
Since you love Wiki so much - 31/12/2009 03:55:09 AM 666 Views
No you are not - 31/12/2009 03:58:28 AM 705 Views
Dude we're discussion works of fiction - 31/12/2009 04:08:12 AM 731 Views
Dumb Bell Distribution of Mongoloid Turings - 31/12/2009 04:36:50 AM 787 Views
Back to school AS, and you will be able to do this - 26/12/2009 12:34:39 PM 634 Views
The problem we're working with is that RJ says strength follows a Bell Curve distribution - 26/12/2009 03:29:26 PM 658 Views
And RJ knew his maths (and you don't) - 31/12/2009 03:22:09 AM 703 Views
I'm not the one who said OP strength followed a Bell Curve Distribution - 31/12/2009 03:34:55 AM 659 Views
You are the one who is MIS-USING his statement - 31/12/2009 03:44:26 AM 669 Views
- 31/12/2009 03:48:20 AM 963 Views
The pathos of Darius - 31/12/2009 04:26:15 AM 687 Views
Is Lanfear the strongest?(now) - 29/12/2009 12:46:13 AM 610 Views
Re: Is Lanfear the strongest?(now) - 29/12/2009 04:21:47 PM 672 Views

Reply to Message