Active Users:1010 Time:23/12/2024 07:56:19 PM
Re: I think because it's smaller... Mat_Cauthon33 Send a noteboard - 22/12/2009 05:40:28 PM
...than most San'angreal, for the amount of power it can channel. No idea where I heard/imagined this. But I got the gist size played a part in how poweful an angreal, hence the Chodan Kal were enormous. But Callandor for its size is far more powerful than it should be, like overclocking a computer cpu, at the (intentional or unintentional) sacrifice of the buffer.

Yeah pretty sure there's no validity in anything I just typed.


Yes there is no validity of that, the strongest Sa'angreal at the WT is a fluted wand... And the angreal that the girls had all were roughly the same size but varied in strength
Reply to message
Callandor - 22/12/2009 12:52:43 PM 1457 Views
I think because it's smaller... - 22/12/2009 02:10:57 PM 806 Views
Re: I think because it's smaller... - 22/12/2009 05:40:28 PM 936 Views
RJ on Callandor and its flaw - 22/12/2009 02:49:11 PM 1209 Views
Damn you for stealing my thunder! *NM* - 22/12/2009 02:53:41 PM 396 Views
Always a pleasure! *NM* - 22/12/2009 02:58:29 PM 363 Views
I'm gonna have to be faster on the trigger with you around... - 22/12/2009 03:01:04 PM 654 Views
I use the Theoryland database. *NM* - 22/12/2009 05:03:06 PM 350 Views
It's always strange to me how despite mass production of angreal and sa'angreal no Forsaken had one - 22/12/2009 09:15:27 PM 669 Views
The only logical answer... - 22/12/2009 10:07:40 PM 768 Views
Stacking up power - 23/12/2009 10:46:46 AM 656 Views
Ummm, why would they seal and ward a flawed sa'angreal in the Stone...? - 22/12/2009 11:42:03 PM 651 Views
Prophecy *NM* - 23/12/2009 12:43:59 AM 384 Views
Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 02:53:23 PM 900 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 05:00:29 PM 721 Views
The Nazi's did have that weapon. - 22/12/2009 05:46:41 PM 978 Views
Re: The Nazi's did have that weapon. - 22/12/2009 06:54:05 PM 699 Views
Where does it say LTT used it? - 22/12/2009 07:29:02 PM 796 Views
I seem to recall... - 22/12/2009 07:40:36 PM 656 Views
Re: I seem to recall... - 22/12/2009 11:11:53 PM 648 Views
Re: I seem to recall... - 23/12/2009 03:13:50 PM 705 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 07:32:53 PM 643 Views
That seems to be just his paranoia talking *NM* - 22/12/2009 07:48:11 PM 337 Views
While I agree... - 22/12/2009 08:11:27 PM 670 Views
How funny is it that they're mass-producing crystalline swords and humanoid statuettes? - 22/12/2009 09:18:33 PM 666 Views
I had a theory... - 22/12/2009 09:25:57 PM 739 Views
Since they were mass produced, I reckon each Forsaken probably had a personal sa'angreal... - 22/12/2009 09:49:14 PM 641 Views
*oops* - 23/12/2009 05:45:32 PM 597 Views
What if I wanted to keep it on my coffee table?? - 23/12/2009 03:57:45 AM 679 Views
Don't forget sa'angreal the size of the Colossus of Rhodes *NM* - 23/12/2009 05:43:10 PM 665 Views
Re: Callandor - 22/12/2009 11:09:26 PM 786 Views
Perhaps a - 23/12/2009 06:23:21 AM 672 Views
Re: Callandor - 23/12/2009 11:07:20 AM 630 Views
That doesn't really fly... - 23/12/2009 03:24:11 PM 657 Views
It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal. - 23/12/2009 05:53:09 PM 759 Views
Re: It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal. - 23/12/2009 06:54:49 PM 594 Views
It could well fly - 24/12/2009 10:23:37 AM 721 Views

Reply to Message