Active Users:445 Time:28/12/2024 10:37:29 AM
Few glaring errors... Shannow Send a noteboard - 20/12/2009 09:04:55 PM
Let me start out by stating the various facts that we know for certain:

1. OP Strength follows a Bell Curve
2. Men are in general stronger than women
3. Lanfear is the strongest woman
4. Rand is the strongest man
5. Egwene is about as strong as Amys and Melaine combined
6. Daigian is the weakest AS
7. Siuan is now less than 50% of her original strength, but still strong enough to be AS
8. 37.5% of Channelers have enough strength to qualify as AS

Assumptions I've made:

1. There is one Bell Curve of distribution, but male and female strength have different scales (balanced by dexterity)... I'm trying to square effective and raw strength measures
2. There are 100 levels (just made the math easier)
3. Linking has a 10-15% penalty on raw strength

Okay so here we go...


Looking at a Bell Curve from 1-100 it's mathematical fact that 50 is the mean-median-mode. What we don't know is the unit of measure between each level on the scale. I've made an attempt to figure out how this could work and I think I've come somewhat close...

If we assume that each level for women allows for a woman to draw approximately 4 "units of saidar". Knowing that a man with the same effective strength also has more raw strength I applied a 25% increase to each "unit of saidin", thus each level for men adds 5 rather than 4. That would make our scale 4-400 for women and 5-500 for men, with Lanfear at 400 being as effective as Rand at 500. In effect we now have a 250 unit man and a 200 unit woman as the respective mean-median-mode yet both root back to 50 on the 100 point scale.

What does that leave us for levels?

If we assume Moiraine is a 50 (200), then it would in fact mean that in order to match Rand it would take 3 women of her strength to be roughly the raw power equivalent to the strongest male. It also squares with Siuan losing more than half of her overall strength and still remaining strong enough to be AS (if she lost 60% she would be about an 80 unit woman and probably right at the cusp of AS minimum).

Egwene would fall at about 320 (effective level 80), more than half Rand in Raw power, but linked with another woman her strength only a little stronger than him, close enough that he could still win a direct confrontation and shielding him would be an uphill battle. Also, linked with Romanda and Lelaine (200 each) still not enough stronger than a FS level male to be 100% certain of victory. Aviendha's assertion that Egwene is as strong as Amy's and Melaine combined is pretty close here if Amys is a 192 (level 48 ) and Melaine a 152 (level 38 ) she's pretty close if not 100% accurate.

Where does that place the "average AS", or even the majority of AS?

I'd say modern AS standards are low enough that a level 18 woman (Daigian) probably represents the lowest, but Level 20 being the more likely "minimum" ... which would be about where Siuan falls now if she lost 60% of her original strength.

Obviously we know that the majority of AS fall below the ranks of Melaine, so I'd venture the guess that 85% or more AS are between level 20 and level 35 ( 80-140) ... this matches up with comments about 13 weakest sisters could handle Rand as they would be more than 2x his raw strength... and even 6 weak sisters could probably maintain a shield on him once it was woven. And it still maps nicely to the 3 needed to hold Semirhage and 2 for Egwene.

So where do the Forsaken fall you ask? Well, on a Bell Curve they should all fall in the top few percent of available strength... which with units of measure added in, there are enough differences to account for the various levels and to account for the lack of outright fear in the top rungs.

Moghedien is clearly the weakest so I'd call her a 93 (372)

Asmodean is probably the weakest male and thus less effective than some of the stronger women I'd say he's a 95 (475)

Mesaana could be also be a 95 (380)

Be'lal/Balthamel seem to be the next males on the list probably 96 (480) or Mesaana could fall here (384)

Semirhage, Sammael, and Rhavin could be 97 (388 and 485) Nynaeve probably fits here.

Graendal and Aginor at 98 (392 and 490) and likely Sharina

Cyndane (Alivia) and Demandred are at 99 (396 and 495)

Lanfear/Ishamael and Rand at 100 (400 and 500)



So you're saying Egwene is 80% as strong as Lanfear? Preposterous, but we'll get there later.

The fundamental point you seem to forget is this.
Since women are effectively as strong as men, when dexterity is taken into account, it means that in a one on one duel you can ignore the male strength advantage and simply look at the comparative level the men and women are at.

So if you place Moiraine at 50, it means that effectively Moiraine and Romanda together should be able to match Rand (who is at 100). Not shield him, but match him. This is patently ridiculous.

Egwene says that she PLUS two women of Moiraine's strength would be hard pressed to match a male Forsaken, and since Egwene is almost twice as strong as Moiraine, that means we are talking approximately 4 women of Moiraine's strength to match a male Forsaken.

Next, you are implying that Egwene is 80% as strong as Lanfear. I would be interested to know how this could be possible if Lanfear can match a male Forsaken, while Egwene would need to link with Lelaine and Romanda to achieve the same feat.

Since you place Egwene at 80, and Lelaine and Romanda at 50 each (they are each equal to Moiraine) it means that together they'll be at 180 in strength. Which is almost double Lanfear's strength.

Clearly you place Egwene VASTLY too high.

What you fail to grasp is that if Rand is twice as strong as Egwene, then it means Lanfear - who is effectively very close to Rand in strength - should also be more or less twice as strong as Egwene. And this is impossible if you place Egwene at 80% of Lanfear's strength.

Basically, I totally disagree with your entire model, but I'll leave it at these initial points to give you a chance to respond.



Reply to message
I've been playing with some numbers since we've been having all of these OP strength debates - 20/12/2009 06:34:05 PM 1280 Views
There are 21 levels, not 100. More later. *NM* - 20/12/2009 07:23:18 PM 452 Views
RJ has said a number of times that the 21 level scale - 20/12/2009 07:35:25 PM 680 Views
Few glaring errors... - 20/12/2009 09:04:55 PM 865 Views
Re: Few glaring errors... - 21/12/2009 07:52:18 AM 835 Views
You don't get it, do you... - 21/12/2009 08:19:00 AM 765 Views
Didn't you claim that Eggy+Rom+Lel cannot match a male forsaken? Now they can match Lanfear? - 21/12/2009 04:14:32 PM 653 Views
That only strengthens my point. - 21/12/2009 06:23:39 PM 702 Views
No it does not. - 28/12/2009 02:45:42 AM 748 Views
What you are missing is that - 21/12/2009 06:46:04 PM 709 Views
I'm not missing it at all.. - 21/12/2009 06:58:04 PM 735 Views
Let's try matching that with the actual text - 22/12/2009 03:01:36 PM 707 Views
Not correct... - 22/12/2009 03:29:24 PM 800 Views
Believe as you like, I'm not here to convince you to otherwise, I'm stating how I read the evidence - 22/12/2009 06:01:24 PM 700 Views
You're reading the evidence wrong. - 22/12/2009 06:27:17 PM 687 Views
RJ also pointed out that Alivia's skill set as a weapon came in handy - 22/12/2009 07:40:35 PM 639 Views
I thought a power law distribution is much more likely, TBH - 20/12/2009 09:39:21 PM 763 Views
Yes. It essentially refers to a skewed histogram - biased to the lower end of the range... - 20/12/2009 09:53:18 PM 797 Views
Corrections - 21/12/2009 01:48:43 AM 814 Views
No... - 21/12/2009 07:47:58 AM 704 Views
True, the application of this model is inconsistent *NM* - 21/12/2009 02:34:26 PM 579 Views
yet RJ has said flat out that OP strength is on an Bell Curve. Meaning the majority of channelers - 21/12/2009 07:36:22 AM 688 Views
Perhaps... - 21/12/2009 07:52:13 AM 752 Views
I've always hated bell curves - 21/12/2009 03:56:26 PM 700 Views
The most logical answer is that the average AOL channeler was stronger than the current average... - 21/12/2009 06:36:07 PM 690 Views
and that in no way maps to any kind of Bell Curve - 22/12/2009 06:02:41 PM 576 Views
Why? - 22/12/2009 06:34:25 PM 708 Views
Can you provide the quote where RJ tells us the - 22/12/2009 07:45:04 PM 621 Views
Always go back to the evidence... - 22/12/2009 09:03:42 PM 783 Views
I'll respond when you can actually provide a few actual quotes to support any of this - 23/12/2009 03:20:44 PM 694 Views
Name an item you dispute and I will provide the quote.... - 23/12/2009 05:19:49 PM 667 Views
it's addressed below - 23/12/2009 05:23:58 PM 677 Views
I've been looking into this a bit... and you really do overstate things to suit your arguments - 24/12/2009 06:15:44 PM 716 Views
And in looking for quotes for another thread I came across this gem - 29/12/2009 09:54:34 PM 686 Views
Nice! It proves what I've been saying for ages... - 29/12/2009 10:13:41 PM 714 Views
Which is why I contend that they are about 80% of Lanfear - 29/12/2009 10:16:07 PM 680 Views
I wasn't trying to rip him a new one. - 22/12/2009 09:38:43 PM 612 Views
I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population - 22/12/2009 08:35:23 PM 724 Views
Except that gateway size is used multiple times by characters to judge comparative strength... - 22/12/2009 09:21:07 PM 719 Views
Re: Except that gateway size is used multiple times by characters to judge comparative strength... - 22/12/2009 11:32:21 PM 825 Views
I agree that it's practically impossible to determine strength - 23/12/2009 03:19:49 PM 711 Views
How convenient. And by the way, it is NOT tied to a Talent. Anyone who is strong enough, can Travel. *NM* - 23/12/2009 04:36:24 PM 419 Views
This is true, however... - 23/12/2009 04:55:48 PM 740 Views
Aviendha's gateway size doesn't decrease. She is just less energy efficient in creating it... - 23/12/2009 05:30:17 PM 982 Views
Aviendha is suffering from the second weave limitation - 23/12/2009 05:37:45 PM 769 Views
Conceded. My faulty memory is to blame in this case. But it doesn't change the rule... - 23/12/2009 06:01:33 PM 622 Views
I'll give you that there is a stength limitation to Traveling - 23/12/2009 06:06:41 PM 659 Views
Why do the characters in the books judge each other's strength on gateway size then? *NM* - 23/12/2009 06:08:17 PM 386 Views
Re: Why do the characters in the books judge each other's strength on gateway size then? - 23/12/2009 06:20:18 PM 681 Views
And there you have it...Thank you. - 23/12/2009 06:27:24 PM 667 Views
And linked with Romanda and Lelaine - 23/12/2009 06:34:42 PM 661 Views
Sorry. That's pure speculation on your part. *NM* - 23/12/2009 06:38:43 PM 394 Views
No more than yours is! - 23/12/2009 06:49:57 PM 698 Views
That entire passage is in the context of strength... - 23/12/2009 07:55:50 PM 605 Views
You need to re-read some of this stuff - 23/12/2009 11:01:15 PM 744 Views
Re: I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population - 26/12/2009 12:38:43 PM 679 Views
Re: I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population - 26/12/2009 06:37:50 PM 664 Views
Goodness - 31/12/2009 03:37:23 AM 703 Views
I'm working within the context of what we've been told by the author - 31/12/2009 03:43:31 AM 652 Views
Since you love Wiki so much - 31/12/2009 03:55:09 AM 665 Views
No you are not - 31/12/2009 03:58:28 AM 705 Views
Dude we're discussion works of fiction - 31/12/2009 04:08:12 AM 731 Views
Dumb Bell Distribution of Mongoloid Turings - 31/12/2009 04:36:50 AM 787 Views
Back to school AS, and you will be able to do this - 26/12/2009 12:34:39 PM 633 Views
The problem we're working with is that RJ says strength follows a Bell Curve distribution - 26/12/2009 03:29:26 PM 657 Views
And RJ knew his maths (and you don't) - 31/12/2009 03:22:09 AM 703 Views
I'm not the one who said OP strength followed a Bell Curve Distribution - 31/12/2009 03:34:55 AM 658 Views
You are the one who is MIS-USING his statement - 31/12/2009 03:44:26 AM 669 Views
- 31/12/2009 03:48:20 AM 962 Views
The pathos of Darius - 31/12/2009 04:26:15 AM 687 Views
Is Lanfear the strongest?(now) - 29/12/2009 12:46:13 AM 609 Views
Re: Is Lanfear the strongest?(now) - 29/12/2009 04:21:47 PM 671 Views

Reply to Message