Active Users:512 Time:05/07/2025 06:20:36 PM
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear... Shannow Send a noteboard - 18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM
Perhaps the distribution would be more Gaussian (bell-shaped) when you consider the whole possible population of channelers rather than just the AS. This is purely speculative, but since in the AoL every possible channeler was found and trained to potential, then perhaps the strength distribution would have been perfectly Gaussian in the AoL.


In the Age of Legends the average woman might have been half as strong as Lanfear, with a perfectly Bell shaped curve, but that doesn't apply to modern channelers.

This entire debate centers around how modern channelers stack up against Forsaken class channelers. And the evidence in the books clearly show that the average Aes Sedai isn't close to 50% as strong as the strongest woman.

Heck, the average Aes Sedai is shown to be less than 50% as strong as Egwene.

So I am perfectly happy to accept a perfect Bell Curve in the Age of Legends. But that wouldn't apply to modern channelers.
Reply to message
The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's strength - 18/12/2009 08:37:55 AM 1478 Views
I always thought the curve was one sided - 18/12/2009 01:17:32 PM 852 Views
I would say that your sample is flawed. - 18/12/2009 05:02:02 PM 923 Views
well said *NM* - 18/12/2009 05:12:40 PM 433 Views
It doesn't matter... - 18/12/2009 10:02:38 PM 786 Views
But, it sort of does. - 18/12/2009 10:43:08 PM 845 Views
So you're saying that no modern Aes Sedai are even of average strength? - 18/12/2009 10:51:01 PM 935 Views
Are you sure it's the same bell curve from the AoL? - 18/12/2009 11:11:19 PM 881 Views
The Tower is restricted to the middle... - 18/12/2009 05:35:03 PM 1007 Views
Two things... - 18/12/2009 09:28:25 PM 841 Views
The culling theory... - 18/12/2009 09:36:34 PM 791 Views
The culling theory applies to the ENTIRE population, not just Aes Sedai... - 18/12/2009 09:42:31 PM 909 Views
Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 09:48:59 PM 976 Views
Re: Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 10:06:15 PM 770 Views
Several more things... - 18/12/2009 11:26:19 PM 933 Views
You don't understand your own model... - 18/12/2009 11:38:05 PM 956 Views
So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:03:24 PM 850 Views
Re: So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:10:52 PM 815 Views
Its simple really... - 19/12/2009 06:15:23 PM 832 Views
Age-Related Sample Bias - 18/12/2009 06:41:03 PM 799 Views
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear... - 18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM 923 Views
Partially agreed... - 18/12/2009 10:13:46 PM 821 Views
A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion... - 18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM 802 Views
Well Sharina isn't a sparker and she's the strongest AS - 18/12/2009 07:57:17 PM 808 Views
Yes... - 18/12/2009 08:01:57 PM 901 Views
Is it just my bad memory or is one of the wondergirls not a sparker? - 18/12/2009 10:12:59 PM 790 Views
I think it's just a bad memory... - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 795 Views
Easier sulution, and real example. - 18/12/2009 10:03:20 PM 856 Views
And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 18/12/2009 10:08:40 PM 812 Views
Re: And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 19/12/2009 11:39:31 AM 1046 Views
Agree, but a little more curvy is better - 19/12/2009 11:17:16 PM 751 Views
*facepalm* - 18/12/2009 10:13:16 PM 831 Views
That's just the normalized value graphed on a log scale. - 19/12/2009 11:20:41 PM 806 Views
Dude, Seriously? - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 823 Views
Indeed, and that's why I propose that... - 18/12/2009 10:31:23 PM 817 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:10 PM 806 Views
It does to RJ - 20/12/2009 03:12:30 PM 896 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:11 PM 780 Views
That's because outliers in IQ tests are excluded form the curve. *NM* - 18/12/2009 11:31:23 PM 462 Views
Really?!?! then what is the definition of a IQ of 200? - 19/12/2009 11:28:18 PM 1108 Views
You can have IQ's above that... - 20/12/2009 05:09:44 AM 826 Views
I said that in the other post and was half torn to pieces *NM* - 19/12/2009 11:38:25 AM 401 Views
Eh. Ignore the IQ value and draw it on a linear weight scale - 19/12/2009 11:26:23 PM 784 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's stre - 19/12/2009 06:02:34 PM 767 Views
I like this idea - 20/12/2009 04:01:28 PM 963 Views
Accidental Post *NM* - 20/12/2009 07:11:09 PM 447 Views
Mathmatically this is very close to the system I proposed in another thread - 27/12/2009 01:23:51 AM 766 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: - 27/12/2009 10:05:33 PM 919 Views
What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 27/12/2009 10:28:13 PM 1118 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:19:14 PM 799 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:30:44 PM 1018 Views

Reply to Message