Active Users:1277 Time:19/12/2024 07:30:02 AM
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear... Shannow Send a noteboard - 18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM
Perhaps the distribution would be more Gaussian (bell-shaped) when you consider the whole possible population of channelers rather than just the AS. This is purely speculative, but since in the AoL every possible channeler was found and trained to potential, then perhaps the strength distribution would have been perfectly Gaussian in the AoL.


In the Age of Legends the average woman might have been half as strong as Lanfear, with a perfectly Bell shaped curve, but that doesn't apply to modern channelers.

This entire debate centers around how modern channelers stack up against Forsaken class channelers. And the evidence in the books clearly show that the average Aes Sedai isn't close to 50% as strong as the strongest woman.

Heck, the average Aes Sedai is shown to be less than 50% as strong as Egwene.

So I am perfectly happy to accept a perfect Bell Curve in the Age of Legends. But that wouldn't apply to modern channelers.
Reply to message
The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's strength - 18/12/2009 08:37:55 AM 1328 Views
I always thought the curve was one sided - 18/12/2009 01:17:32 PM 734 Views
I would say that your sample is flawed. - 18/12/2009 05:02:02 PM 816 Views
well said *NM* - 18/12/2009 05:12:40 PM 382 Views
It doesn't matter... - 18/12/2009 10:02:38 PM 671 Views
But, it sort of does. - 18/12/2009 10:43:08 PM 724 Views
So you're saying that no modern Aes Sedai are even of average strength? - 18/12/2009 10:51:01 PM 797 Views
Are you sure it's the same bell curve from the AoL? - 18/12/2009 11:11:19 PM 763 Views
The Tower is restricted to the middle... - 18/12/2009 05:35:03 PM 889 Views
Two things... - 18/12/2009 09:28:25 PM 731 Views
The culling theory... - 18/12/2009 09:36:34 PM 662 Views
The culling theory applies to the ENTIRE population, not just Aes Sedai... - 18/12/2009 09:42:31 PM 790 Views
Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 09:48:59 PM 852 Views
Re: Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 10:06:15 PM 653 Views
Several more things... - 18/12/2009 11:26:19 PM 826 Views
You don't understand your own model... - 18/12/2009 11:38:05 PM 839 Views
So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:03:24 PM 745 Views
Re: So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:10:52 PM 701 Views
Its simple really... - 19/12/2009 06:15:23 PM 716 Views
Age-Related Sample Bias - 18/12/2009 06:41:03 PM 686 Views
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear... - 18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM 814 Views
Partially agreed... - 18/12/2009 10:13:46 PM 696 Views
A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion... - 18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM 686 Views
Well Sharina isn't a sparker and she's the strongest AS - 18/12/2009 07:57:17 PM 693 Views
Yes... - 18/12/2009 08:01:57 PM 778 Views
Is it just my bad memory or is one of the wondergirls not a sparker? - 18/12/2009 10:12:59 PM 677 Views
I think it's just a bad memory... - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 671 Views
Easier sulution, and real example. - 18/12/2009 10:03:20 PM 728 Views
And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 18/12/2009 10:08:40 PM 698 Views
Re: And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 19/12/2009 11:39:31 AM 939 Views
Agree, but a little more curvy is better - 19/12/2009 11:17:16 PM 627 Views
*facepalm* - 18/12/2009 10:13:16 PM 721 Views
That's just the normalized value graphed on a log scale. - 19/12/2009 11:20:41 PM 686 Views
Dude, Seriously? - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 720 Views
Indeed, and that's why I propose that... - 18/12/2009 10:31:23 PM 702 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:10 PM 684 Views
It does to RJ - 20/12/2009 03:12:30 PM 766 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:11 PM 659 Views
That's because outliers in IQ tests are excluded form the curve. *NM* - 18/12/2009 11:31:23 PM 405 Views
Really?!?! then what is the definition of a IQ of 200? - 19/12/2009 11:28:18 PM 997 Views
You can have IQ's above that... - 20/12/2009 05:09:44 AM 710 Views
I said that in the other post and was half torn to pieces *NM* - 19/12/2009 11:38:25 AM 350 Views
Eh. Ignore the IQ value and draw it on a linear weight scale - 19/12/2009 11:26:23 PM 677 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's stre - 19/12/2009 06:02:34 PM 641 Views
I like this idea - 20/12/2009 04:01:28 PM 845 Views
Accidental Post *NM* - 20/12/2009 07:11:09 PM 400 Views
Mathmatically this is very close to the system I proposed in another thread - 27/12/2009 01:23:51 AM 649 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: - 27/12/2009 10:05:33 PM 791 Views
What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 27/12/2009 10:28:13 PM 992 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:19:14 PM 688 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:30:44 PM 890 Views

Reply to Message