Active Users:2505 Time:19/01/2025 07:45:26 AM
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear... Shannow Send a noteboard - 18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM
Perhaps the distribution would be more Gaussian (bell-shaped) when you consider the whole possible population of channelers rather than just the AS. This is purely speculative, but since in the AoL every possible channeler was found and trained to potential, then perhaps the strength distribution would have been perfectly Gaussian in the AoL.


In the Age of Legends the average woman might have been half as strong as Lanfear, with a perfectly Bell shaped curve, but that doesn't apply to modern channelers.

This entire debate centers around how modern channelers stack up against Forsaken class channelers. And the evidence in the books clearly show that the average Aes Sedai isn't close to 50% as strong as the strongest woman.

Heck, the average Aes Sedai is shown to be less than 50% as strong as Egwene.

So I am perfectly happy to accept a perfect Bell Curve in the Age of Legends. But that wouldn't apply to modern channelers.
Reply to message
The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's strength - 18/12/2009 08:37:55 AM 1353 Views
I always thought the curve was one sided - 18/12/2009 01:17:32 PM 761 Views
I would say that your sample is flawed. - 18/12/2009 05:02:02 PM 838 Views
well said *NM* - 18/12/2009 05:12:40 PM 395 Views
It doesn't matter... - 18/12/2009 10:02:38 PM 699 Views
But, it sort of does. - 18/12/2009 10:43:08 PM 751 Views
So you're saying that no modern Aes Sedai are even of average strength? - 18/12/2009 10:51:01 PM 818 Views
Are you sure it's the same bell curve from the AoL? - 18/12/2009 11:11:19 PM 787 Views
The Tower is restricted to the middle... - 18/12/2009 05:35:03 PM 918 Views
Two things... - 18/12/2009 09:28:25 PM 755 Views
The culling theory... - 18/12/2009 09:36:34 PM 692 Views
The culling theory applies to the ENTIRE population, not just Aes Sedai... - 18/12/2009 09:42:31 PM 815 Views
Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 09:48:59 PM 886 Views
Re: Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 10:06:15 PM 674 Views
Several more things... - 18/12/2009 11:26:19 PM 849 Views
You don't understand your own model... - 18/12/2009 11:38:05 PM 868 Views
So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:03:24 PM 770 Views
Re: So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:10:52 PM 728 Views
Its simple really... - 19/12/2009 06:15:23 PM 736 Views
Age-Related Sample Bias - 18/12/2009 06:41:03 PM 710 Views
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear... - 18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM 838 Views
Partially agreed... - 18/12/2009 10:13:46 PM 726 Views
A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion... - 18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM 716 Views
Well Sharina isn't a sparker and she's the strongest AS - 18/12/2009 07:57:17 PM 721 Views
Yes... - 18/12/2009 08:01:57 PM 811 Views
Is it just my bad memory or is one of the wondergirls not a sparker? - 18/12/2009 10:12:59 PM 699 Views
I think it's just a bad memory... - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 701 Views
Easier sulution, and real example. - 18/12/2009 10:03:20 PM 757 Views
And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 18/12/2009 10:08:40 PM 727 Views
Re: And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 19/12/2009 11:39:31 AM 960 Views
Agree, but a little more curvy is better - 19/12/2009 11:17:16 PM 660 Views
*facepalm* - 18/12/2009 10:13:16 PM 745 Views
That's just the normalized value graphed on a log scale. - 19/12/2009 11:20:41 PM 713 Views
Dude, Seriously? - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 745 Views
Indeed, and that's why I propose that... - 18/12/2009 10:31:23 PM 731 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:10 PM 711 Views
It does to RJ - 20/12/2009 03:12:30 PM 794 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:11 PM 687 Views
That's because outliers in IQ tests are excluded form the curve. *NM* - 18/12/2009 11:31:23 PM 422 Views
Really?!?! then what is the definition of a IQ of 200? - 19/12/2009 11:28:18 PM 1020 Views
You can have IQ's above that... - 20/12/2009 05:09:44 AM 734 Views
I said that in the other post and was half torn to pieces *NM* - 19/12/2009 11:38:25 AM 362 Views
Eh. Ignore the IQ value and draw it on a linear weight scale - 19/12/2009 11:26:23 PM 702 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's stre - 19/12/2009 06:02:34 PM 663 Views
I like this idea - 20/12/2009 04:01:28 PM 869 Views
Accidental Post *NM* - 20/12/2009 07:11:09 PM 412 Views
Mathmatically this is very close to the system I proposed in another thread - 27/12/2009 01:23:51 AM 677 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: - 27/12/2009 10:05:33 PM 824 Views
What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 27/12/2009 10:28:13 PM 1021 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:19:14 PM 714 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:30:44 PM 923 Views

Reply to Message