Re: As if you could possibly know that. You admit even spin is too much for you to handle 
- Edit 1
- Edit 1Before modification by rAndy aL at 18/12/2009 10:33:36 AM
<qoute>If you are impressed by the length, I don't care enough for yourn opinion to bother. You are too easily impressed to be worth gaining your acclaim. As for the one sort-of argument you DO make...
A. I can make the same counter-argument: You are not objective, and are merely twisting facts to give Egwene the best possible interpretation! If the shields are so easy for Mesaana to breech, why hasn't she done so? What is to keep her from having access to the new place?
Mesaana is an idiot. Alternatively, Egwene is the smartest person ever. Your pick.
You mean like it was before? The objects in that room are locked up because they are either valuable or dangerous (possibly both). Egwene has now proved that anyone at all could just Travel in and take them. I don't need to search for some fantastically good interpretation to put on her decision when the obvious one is already there.
I can't prove your claim isn't true. I can provide a much simpler explanation, and infer that it is more likely to be true.
A. I can make the same counter-argument: You are not objective, and are merely twisting facts to give Egwene the best possible interpretation! If the shields are so easy for Mesaana to breech, why hasn't she done so? What is to keep her from having access to the new place?
Mesaana is an idiot. Alternatively, Egwene is the smartest person ever. Your pick.
B. Can you prove any untruth to my claim? She is, in fact, planning to hide them to limit their access to only she & those of whom she approves.
You mean like it was before? The objects in that room are locked up because they are either valuable or dangerous (possibly both). Egwene has now proved that anyone at all could just Travel in and take them. I don't need to search for some fantastically good interpretation to put on her decision when the obvious one is already there.
I can't prove your claim isn't true. I can provide a much simpler explanation, and infer that it is more likely to be true.