Active Users:936 Time:15/11/2024 06:30:11 AM
The oaths stand as no bar. Logain Send a noteboard - 17/12/2009 02:48:32 PM
Your idea makes sense if there was an open war between the AS and the Seanchan. However, AS cannot plan to attack the Seanchan and go along with the army to fight actively. That would be a violation of their oaths IMHO. The Seanchan are not darkfriends.


See my above post. The oaths don't prevent AS from attacking. The oaths simply prevent the AS from attacking until they feel threatened. For an example, see the AS with Perrin when they go to rescue Rand at Dumai's Wells. You are saying that the AS could never go on the offensive because that would mean using the OP as a weapon. But that is wrong. The AS can go on the offensive, they just can't start killing the Seanchan until they feel threatened. They can certainly start shielding the Seanchan and as soon as the Seanchan try to fight back, then the AS can use deadly force.
Reply to message
Learning traveling will help the Seanchan, but the AS still have the advantage. - 17/12/2009 01:13:32 AM 1292 Views
Bryne will without a doubt be in charge - 17/12/2009 01:28:02 AM 650 Views
Re: Learning traveling will help the Seanchan, but the AS still have the advantage. - 17/12/2009 01:39:32 AM 787 Views
Linking provides another benefit. - 17/12/2009 02:02:05 AM 718 Views
Wow, if that happens, I will be her biggest fan *NM* - 17/12/2009 02:10:01 AM 411 Views
What an utterly stupid idea. - 17/12/2009 11:35:24 AM 679 Views
Your facts are incorrect. - 17/12/2009 02:41:42 PM 695 Views
There is a way to get around the "first strike" limitation. - 17/12/2009 05:25:05 PM 615 Views
another linking advantage - 17/12/2009 02:10:56 AM 596 Views
All that will do is take the best fighters out of action. - 17/12/2009 11:55:55 AM 642 Views
I have to agree with Cannoli on this, but with a twist. - 17/12/2009 02:46:03 PM 702 Views
Why mace of air? - 17/12/2009 05:58:32 PM 617 Views
Re: All that will do is take the best fighters out of action. - 17/12/2009 07:38:55 PM 551 Views
Re: All that will do is take the best fighters out of action. - 17/12/2009 08:49:28 PM 521 Views
Why did you post this? - 17/12/2009 09:35:09 AM 696 Views
I have not read Darius Sedai's post. Sorry. *NM* - 17/12/2009 02:49:20 PM 323 Views
What post are you talking about? - 17/12/2009 04:57:14 PM 504 Views
Re: What post are you talking about? - 17/12/2009 11:31:06 PM 625 Views
Here it is - 18/12/2009 12:42:45 AM 577 Views
I actually brought it up in an earlier thread too *NM* - 18/12/2009 12:46:56 AM 314 Views
thanks for the credit... PS I'm a guy *NM* - 18/12/2009 12:10:56 AM 344 Views
Ooops - 18/12/2009 12:48:22 AM 595 Views
I'm totally teasing you ... I added the "sedai" to be snarky - 18/12/2009 12:55:51 AM 985 Views
Yeah, I don't get that: Fantasy gender-nuetral honorific, plus Real World male name = female? - 18/12/2009 05:35:17 AM 650 Views
Cannoli sedai? *NM* - 18/12/2009 02:15:18 PM 596 Views
what about the oaths - 17/12/2009 01:24:57 PM 641 Views
The oaths stand as no bar. - 17/12/2009 02:48:32 PM 618 Views

Reply to Message