Active Users:896 Time:15/11/2024 06:13:47 AM
I have to agree with Cannoli on this, but with a twist. Logain Send a noteboard - 17/12/2009 02:46:03 PM
The damane and sul'dam cannot see the weaves from men. I'd dress up the bonded Asha'man to make them look like tower guards. Then I'd have the Asha'man simply club every sul'dam and damane they see with a mace of air. The Seanchan would have no idea what was hitting them. They'd be focusing all their attention on the circles of women. After all, who could ignore the enormous volumes of power being wielded right in front of your face by the circles of women. That's the secret power of the ASha'man disguised as tower guards. While the seanchan focus on the AS circles, the Asha'man would be extremely deadly.
Reply to message
Learning traveling will help the Seanchan, but the AS still have the advantage. - 17/12/2009 01:13:32 AM 1292 Views
Bryne will without a doubt be in charge - 17/12/2009 01:28:02 AM 649 Views
Re: Learning traveling will help the Seanchan, but the AS still have the advantage. - 17/12/2009 01:39:32 AM 787 Views
Linking provides another benefit. - 17/12/2009 02:02:05 AM 717 Views
Wow, if that happens, I will be her biggest fan *NM* - 17/12/2009 02:10:01 AM 411 Views
What an utterly stupid idea. - 17/12/2009 11:35:24 AM 678 Views
Your facts are incorrect. - 17/12/2009 02:41:42 PM 695 Views
There is a way to get around the "first strike" limitation. - 17/12/2009 05:25:05 PM 614 Views
another linking advantage - 17/12/2009 02:10:56 AM 596 Views
All that will do is take the best fighters out of action. - 17/12/2009 11:55:55 AM 641 Views
I have to agree with Cannoli on this, but with a twist. - 17/12/2009 02:46:03 PM 702 Views
Why mace of air? - 17/12/2009 05:58:32 PM 617 Views
Re: All that will do is take the best fighters out of action. - 17/12/2009 07:38:55 PM 550 Views
Re: All that will do is take the best fighters out of action. - 17/12/2009 08:49:28 PM 521 Views
Why did you post this? - 17/12/2009 09:35:09 AM 696 Views
I have not read Darius Sedai's post. Sorry. *NM* - 17/12/2009 02:49:20 PM 323 Views
What post are you talking about? - 17/12/2009 04:57:14 PM 504 Views
Re: What post are you talking about? - 17/12/2009 11:31:06 PM 624 Views
Here it is - 18/12/2009 12:42:45 AM 576 Views
I actually brought it up in an earlier thread too *NM* - 18/12/2009 12:46:56 AM 314 Views
thanks for the credit... PS I'm a guy *NM* - 18/12/2009 12:10:56 AM 343 Views
Ooops - 18/12/2009 12:48:22 AM 595 Views
I'm totally teasing you ... I added the "sedai" to be snarky - 18/12/2009 12:55:51 AM 984 Views
Yeah, I don't get that: Fantasy gender-nuetral honorific, plus Real World male name = female? - 18/12/2009 05:35:17 AM 650 Views
Cannoli sedai? *NM* - 18/12/2009 02:15:18 PM 596 Views
what about the oaths - 17/12/2009 01:24:57 PM 640 Views
The oaths stand as no bar. - 17/12/2009 02:48:32 PM 617 Views

Reply to Message