Unless we take Jordan's conceit of a past/future tale literally. Perhaps that's plausible in a "million monkeys" version of branching timelines, but I don't think that's what you're suggesting. If you simply mean Jordan's saying the stories have no true origin because "there are neither beginnings nor endings" a strong argument could be made. I'm not convinced, however, how much Jordan actually means to support cyclic time in the real world and how much that's just a conceit framing the other things he wishes to say. The concept of breaking the Wheel is prominent throughout the series, and in TGS we finally see Rand explicitly say something similar in type if not goal to what Ishy has: He not only wishes to defeat the DO, but, if possible, to destroy him. One can't help but wonder if, without the Creator's antithesis, that would break the Wheel as effectively as anything Ishy or the DO could do.

It's certainly a rich area for discussion, and I think arguments can be made both ways that Jordan is endorsing the concept of cyclic time. It's very fortunate there are no deep themes in the mere story or we would run the dire risk of a serious discussion.