This really is a massive gap in the Oath. It's not really used in the books that way but it could be. A Sister could lie freely as long as she thought she was being sarcastic. How the person she is talking to takes it is secondary.
I mean, c'mon... here's a typical excange between a normal person and an AS (I believe there are at least two exchanges almost exactly like this in the series):
Q: "What is your name?"
A: "You may call me Alyce."
Not technically a lie, since the AS is not saying her name is Alyce, but the intent is clearly a lie.
The oaths are next to worthless. Especially since everyone in the Westlands seems to be aware that AS do this so no one ever believes them anyway.
This message last edited by BlackAdder on 07/12/2009 at 05:13:27 AM
Cadsuane lies!
06/12/2009 06:10:41 PM
- 2020 Views
Re: Cadsuane lies!
06/12/2009 06:18:39 PM
- 1225 Views
Sarcasm is one thing
06/12/2009 06:43:12 PM
- 946 Views
I disagree
06/12/2009 06:51:27 PM
- 902 Views
RJ has said they're allowed to be sarcastic
06/12/2009 07:07:32 PM
- 863 Views
How does that jive with the Oaths?
06/12/2009 07:13:21 PM
- 902 Views
Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying *NM*
06/12/2009 07:53:31 PM
- 414 Views
Re: Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying
06/12/2009 08:03:36 PM
- 957 Views
The Oaths focus on INTENT
06/12/2009 10:01:27 PM
- 859 Views
Because it isn't a lie
06/12/2009 07:44:29 PM
- 868 Views
I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
06/12/2009 08:08:15 PM
- 859 Views
Re: I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
06/12/2009 08:35:23 PM
- 886 Views
Quote for you
06/12/2009 08:42:52 PM
- 823 Views
The sarcasm was for him repeating himself to her. The "remember" is the part she's refering to.
07/12/2009 10:15:06 AM
- 664 Views
That's why I think this example of sarcasm works as opposed to Cadsuane who makes a false statement
07/12/2009 03:17:52 PM
- 722 Views
sarcasm is sarcasm. In both instances their is technically a lie.
07/12/2009 11:28:02 PM
- 682 Views
Not at all the case
07/12/2009 11:58:42 PM
- 770 Views
Do you really believe he waited till the last minute to tell Seonid?
14/12/2009 01:32:37 PM
- 830 Views
What about the Sheriam thing?
07/12/2009 01:49:32 PM
- 705 Views
Re: What about the Sheriam thing?
07/12/2009 02:15:25 PM
- 669 Views
But surely an Aes Sedai can answer a question she hasn't fully heard yet.
07/12/2009 03:06:34 PM
- 806 Views
Sarcasm
06/12/2009 07:14:47 PM
- 900 Views
It's obviously meant to be sarcasm, I just don't like
06/12/2009 07:18:40 PM
- 695 Views
Here is what RJ said about it
06/12/2009 07:41:18 PM
- 845 Views
Well I have to say I think RJ made the wrong call with this one *NM*
06/12/2009 07:43:47 PM
- 369 Views
Agreed.
07/12/2009 01:45:39 AM
- 649 Views
You can already drive a truck through the oaths. Does this one additional tiny gap really matter?
07/12/2009 04:07:16 AM
- 678 Views
Alys (Moiraine alias) *NM*
07/12/2009 05:13:18 AM
- 992 Views
what do you think a RL lie detector would tell in this case?
07/12/2009 12:27:07 PM
- 647 Views
in RL you would get warned by the investigator to cooperate
07/12/2009 01:04:33 PM
- 694 Views
But how would the machine reading indicate?
07/12/2009 07:04:22 PM
- 677 Views
Usually you're s'possed to answer with a yes or no. It's easy to tell when you're evasive
09/12/2009 10:46:58 PM
- 703 Views
Where's the problem?
09/12/2009 04:18:40 PM
- 609 Views
It's in the way the Oath is worded
09/12/2009 05:14:39 PM
- 663 Views
PS You misread my original quote
09/12/2009 11:00:56 PM
- 614 Views
Lies, untruths, sarcasm, and meaning
09/12/2009 07:46:25 PM
- 741 Views
We are starting understand each other
09/12/2009 10:09:41 PM
- 702 Views