I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM*
Tansu Targli Send a noteboard - 01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM
Mesaana was easily able to get past the Oath Rod.
01/12/2009 09:35:07 PM
- 1210 Views
I'm not convinced. I don't believe she'd want to subject herself to being sworn.
01/12/2009 09:54:40 PM
- 735 Views
Not just that, but in the AoL, the Oath Rod was used to "bind criminals". *NM*
02/12/2009 05:41:35 AM
- 270 Views
Didn't Sanderson say as much? *NM*
01/12/2009 10:06:56 PM
- 258 Views
I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM*
01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM
- 240 Views
I thought...
01/12/2009 10:11:45 PM
- 573 Views
To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths.
01/12/2009 10:37:29 PM
- 586 Views
Well, that's just one oath. The other two are not as easy to circumvent.
02/12/2009 01:19:53 AM
- 671 Views
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger"
02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM
- 496 Views
Last defense of life cannot mean potential danger. *NM*
02/12/2009 05:51:27 PM
- 211 Views
Yes it can. It all depends on interpretation.
03/12/2009 12:22:47 AM
- 496 Views
Ummm, what?
03/12/2009 02:23:08 AM
- 435 Views
Re: Ummm, what?
03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM
- 454 Views
None of this is a twisting of the Oaths. Her actions stick to the letter of the Oaths.
04/12/2009 04:29:44 AM
- 569 Views
Here's a couple quotes from BS
01/12/2009 11:57:16 PM
- 602 Views
Trouble is that would put a person into stasis
02/12/2009 04:14:31 AM
- 479 Views
It only has to be maintained long enough to take the Oaths. *NM*
02/12/2009 04:51:34 AM
- 222 Views
Eh, from what we've seen, Keepings don't really work like that
02/12/2009 06:42:19 AM
- 623 Views