Active Users:771 Time:15/11/2024 03:25:48 PM
It's possible Logain Send a noteboard - 30/11/2009 08:23:28 PM
One additional point I'd add to lend credence to Graendal being higher up the list is this quote:

~The Fires of Heaven


"If this Rand al'Thor really is Lews Therin Telamon reborn," Graendal went on, settling herself on the man's back where he crouched on all fours, "I am surprised you haven't tried to snuggle him into your bed, Lanfear. Or would it be so easy? I seem to remember Lews Therin led you by the nose, not the other way around. Squelched your little tantrums. Sent you running to fetch his wine, in a manner of speaking." She set her own wine on the tray, held out rigidly by the sightlessly kneeling woman. "You were so obsessed with him you'd have stretched out at his feet if he said 'rug'."

No way a woman significantly weaker throws this in Lanfears face! Just minutes later the two almost end up in a duel, if not for Rhavin we may well have seen a chick-Forsaken fight

Graendal is a lot of the things, but stupid is not one of them. We know that she will not risk facing Rand head-to-head, but she was willing to face Lanfear? Very unlikely IMO unless she was close enough in strength that she felt her skill could overcome Lanfear's power.


What you are saying is possible. However, even if Graendal is the second strongest Forsaken, she would have to be at least two levels below Lanfear. Lanfear is stronger than Cyndane. Cyndane is stronger than Graendal. With a minimum of two levels separating Lanfear and Graendal, Graendal is outmatched no matter what. What difference does it make if Graendal was 3 levels below Lanfear or 4 levels below?

I think Graendal was seeing how far she could press Lanfear. I also think that Graendal would not have pressed her like that except for the fact that Sammael and Rahvin were nearby. I think Graendal knew Lanfear would restrain herself (to some degree) with the men there.
Reply to message
Female Forsaken strength : a new post - 19/11/2009 04:12:35 PM 1638 Views
Except... - 19/11/2009 04:26:32 PM 679 Views
There's no evidence for that - 19/11/2009 04:31:17 PM 637 Views
It's common sense - 19/11/2009 04:40:01 PM 617 Views
No, it's based on absolutely nothing - 19/11/2009 04:50:30 PM 651 Views
If you agree that there are stronger damane than Alivia... - 19/11/2009 05:00:05 PM 568 Views
I didn't say that - 19/11/2009 05:07:33 PM 588 Views
Well, I think you are wrong... - 19/11/2009 05:35:27 PM 568 Views
Glad to have you back. Now for the arguments to start! - 19/11/2009 04:29:01 PM 696 Views
Hmm... - 19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM 689 Views
Actually, you are the one placing Lanfear immensely high, my list reduced the strength difference... - 19/11/2009 05:05:18 PM 762 Views
But I'm not - 19/11/2009 05:17:05 PM 671 Views
Let me ask you this... - 19/11/2009 10:13:12 PM 713 Views
Very good point *NM* - 20/11/2009 01:38:55 AM 302 Views
One possibility - 20/11/2009 03:18:55 AM 621 Views
All assumption - 20/11/2009 04:11:20 AM 566 Views
Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance? - 20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM 541 Views
You don't know the significance of it at all - 20/11/2009 03:14:46 PM 654 Views
Why? - 20/11/2009 03:17:51 PM 1181 Views
Re: Why? - 20/11/2009 04:30:50 PM 532 Views
How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)... - 20/11/2009 05:07:39 PM 569 Views
Re: How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)... - 21/11/2009 10:55:47 AM 551 Views
Is Graendal the only Forsaken NOT to overstate her own ability then? - 21/11/2009 01:53:28 PM 663 Views
Probably not in this case - 21/11/2009 11:34:25 PM 542 Views
Your rankings hinge ENTIRELY on whether you have Graendal correctly placed. - 20/11/2009 03:24:22 PM 502 Views
Yeah... entirely - 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM 524 Views
Okay, "entirely" was a bad choice of word. - 20/11/2009 09:57:52 PM 548 Views
Re: Okay, "entirely" was a bad choice of word. - 21/11/2009 10:48:16 AM 611 Views
Re: Let me ask you this... - 23/12/2009 04:30:27 PM 580 Views
*correction*Re: Let me ask you this... - 23/12/2009 04:32:02 PM 548 Views
my comments w/ edit - 19/11/2009 04:37:27 PM 631 Views
Re: my comments w/ edit - 19/11/2009 04:54:30 PM 700 Views
Re: my comments w/ edit - 23/12/2009 04:42:15 PM 504 Views
What ever happened to all teh info from wotmania? Especially the FAQs? *NM* - 19/11/2009 05:01:45 PM 388 Views
http://13depository.blogspot.com/ *NM* - 19/11/2009 05:31:01 PM 314 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post - 19/11/2009 05:39:10 PM 649 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post -- What about Dexterity?? - 19/11/2009 06:44:31 PM 659 Views
This perfectly matches my understanding of the situation. - 19/11/2009 07:06:31 PM 525 Views
Agreed! This make more sense than the previous list *NM* - 20/11/2009 12:07:37 AM 348 Views
Too many levels - 20/11/2009 01:48:24 AM 652 Views
You are completely right about too many levels. - 20/11/2009 04:17:17 AM 539 Views
21 levels is largely a myth - 20/11/2009 04:27:27 AM 534 Views
Re: 21 levels is largely a myth - 20/11/2009 01:51:17 PM 672 Views
Thanks for the post. Interesting stuff there. *NM* - 20/11/2009 03:14:12 PM 286 Views
That's good to know. - 20/11/2009 07:56:41 PM 505 Views
I have to disagree for a couple of reasons. - 20/11/2009 04:14:40 AM 642 Views
Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve - 28/11/2009 08:27:22 PM 671 Views
Re: Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve - 28/11/2009 10:05:15 PM 757 Views
Talaan has be channeling for 6 or 7 years - 28/11/2009 10:56:12 PM 573 Views
Re: I have to disagree for a couple of reasons. - 30/12/2009 12:37:40 AM 991 Views
Agree with nearly all - 20/11/2009 04:43:47 AM 540 Views
more hopefully to come - 20/11/2009 08:15:00 PM 516 Views
Thanks KCF, that's a great question to ask. - 20/11/2009 08:28:32 PM 738 Views
A little more evidence that Nynaeve is stronger than Semirhage - 29/11/2009 12:12:37 AM 537 Views
I agree that Graendal is the 2nd most powerful woman Forsaken - 29/11/2009 04:07:00 PM 505 Views
It's possible - 30/11/2009 08:23:28 PM 509 Views
Re: It's possible - 01/12/2009 06:18:56 PM 618 Views

Reply to Message