In Every Case the Literal Words Were Truthful.
The Name With No Man Send a noteboard - 27/11/2009 02:09:10 PM
In this case they wouldn't be. You can be entirely truthful and entirely deceptive with truthful statements that imply an untruth. What you suggest is not a statement, but it's also false on its face. Implying falsehood with truth is deception, but implying falsehood with falsehood is just plain old lying.
Bound by the three oaths, can you can lie if you make it a question? As in "I am not Black Ajah?
22/11/2009 06:01:54 AM
- 1019 Views
If you were intentionally trying to deceive someone, then no, you coldn't *NM*
22/11/2009 11:19:30 AM
- 256 Views
Throughout the series sisters have chosen their words to deceive, why would context matter. *NM*
22/11/2009 03:20:37 PM
- 268 Views
In Every Case the Literal Words Were Truthful.
27/11/2009 02:09:10 PM
- 488 Views
Let's just say this is a real world with a real language for a moment.
22/11/2009 10:47:40 PM
- 586 Views
In real world you assume when I ask the question that I am not trying to deceive
23/11/2009 04:05:38 PM
- 588 Views
Re: Bound by the three oaths, can you can lie if you make it a question? As in "I am not Black Ajah?
25/11/2009 04:23:06 PM
- 1039 Views
I think the oaths so vague and depend on the morality of the speaker
25/11/2009 06:27:19 PM
- 537 Views