Active Users:888 Time:08/11/2025 08:15:38 PM
The only "most cusual observer" was RJ Nargs Send a noteboard - 26/11/2009 02:41:32 AM
Dont you think that if it was possible to figure it out in the first 5 books alone that it would have been done by now?

Actually, It has according to BS. BS stated that the correct theory is out there.

However... the correct theory is hidden among 100 other theories about who dun it. Theories that cannot be disproven with 100% surety. The correct theory is just another of those theories.

Because of all of those other possibilities it is impossible to deduce who dun it based on books 1 through 5 alone... or even 1 thru 11.

Sure... the correct theory can sustain itself using soley information from books 1 through 5 but so can many other theories. That is why it is impossible for us to figure out who dun it.

Jordan's comments were carefully calculated to stir the hornets nest for his viewing pleasure.

The only casual observer was RJ. Casually observing you and the rest of us squirm about who dun it.

Reply to message
Why is the likelihood that Lanfear killed Asmodean based on Sanderson's new revelations? - 25/11/2009 11:10:15 PM 1961 Views
I don't believe Lanfear did it - 26/11/2009 12:36:48 AM 1136 Views
Anything Jordan said regarding Asmo can be thrown out... - 26/11/2009 12:42:23 AM 1185 Views
Re: Anything Jordan said regarding Asmo can be thrown out... - 26/11/2009 12:48:30 AM 942 Views
Indeed - 26/11/2009 12:58:08 AM 1208 Views
The only "most cusual observer" was RJ - 26/11/2009 02:41:32 AM 990 Views
RJ's hint to the correct theory - 05/03/2010 01:52:31 PM 831 Views
Re: I don't believe Lanfear did it - 26/11/2009 12:44:53 AM 950 Views
I still have absolutely no idea who killed him... - 26/11/2009 12:58:34 AM 1170 Views
Small, but possible - 26/11/2009 01:16:13 AM 951 Views
Re: Why is the likelihood that Lanfear killed Asmodean based on Sanderson's new revelations? - 26/11/2009 02:36:38 AM 1110 Views
Cyndane does mean "Last Chance" - 26/11/2009 05:06:00 AM 912 Views
Um, what about the Gholam? - 26/11/2009 05:55:06 AM 985 Views
The name "gholam" wasn't mentioned until LoC chap. 3 - 26/11/2009 09:33:54 AM 925 Views
I think... - 26/11/2009 03:44:00 PM 958 Views
"on Sanderson's new revelations?" Little. That she did it regardless? High. - 26/11/2009 04:50:49 PM 948 Views
Excellent to hear I'm not alone. - 26/11/2009 08:01:54 PM 902 Views

Reply to Message