Active Users:1232 Time:23/02/2025 07:29:16 PM
Umm... everynametaken Send a noteboard - 25/11/2009 12:56:32 AM
I think Moghedian is pulling strings in Caemlyn as well as running errands for Moridin

I believe Halima ran off to the BT. There's a coming fight between the White and Black Towers in ToM and I think we'll find Halima involved. Clearly lots has been going down at the BT - AS probably bonded to DFs/Dreadlords and I think it's likely that there are 13 Myrdraal on hand to make things particularly interesting.

Not that you asked, but I think Cyndane is hunting for Mat and Perrin - she's probably behind Masema and was the forsaken coming to him in 'visions'. There's probably some complusion involved as well.


Wouldn't it be a little weird for a woman who channels the male half of the power to show up at the Black Tower It almost got her busted in the Aes Sedai camp when the Ashaman recognized the male half being used by someone.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
Moghedien and Balthamel - 24/11/2009 06:22:19 PM 1321 Views
I think... - 24/11/2009 06:34:24 PM 775 Views
They're working their way overland - 28/11/2009 01:49:26 AM 581 Views
Demandred - 24/11/2009 06:35:06 PM 882 Views
Maybe Arangar is with the Seanchan - 24/11/2009 06:41:00 PM 696 Views
Yes, he is - 24/11/2009 07:11:13 PM 853 Views
Galgan cannot be Demandred as Galgan appeared in KoD - 24/11/2009 08:26:34 PM 829 Views
Has Demandred's alter-ego been seen in tGS? *NM* - 24/11/2009 08:43:47 PM 349 Views
Brandon isn't saying - 24/11/2009 08:46:36 PM 666 Views
my thoughts - 24/11/2009 08:50:20 PM 741 Views
Umm... - 25/11/2009 12:56:32 AM 722 Views
Not necessarily a problem - 25/11/2009 09:23:16 AM 620 Views
Men don't need to mask the ability - 28/11/2009 02:11:05 AM 527 Views
Re: Moghedien and Balthamel - 25/11/2009 01:14:30 AM 651 Views
Re: Moghedien and Balthamel - 25/11/2009 08:16:02 PM 702 Views
I never thought of that possibility - 28/11/2009 02:13:13 AM 625 Views

Reply to Message