Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance?
Shannow Send a noteboard - 20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM
In other words, why go to all the trouble of creating a mechanism whereby a transmigrated Forsaken's strength can be reduced, if it is to have no real impact?
Where Semirhage's source of strength was her reputation as a torturer, and the fear this evoked in others, Lanfear's source of strength has always simply been her STRENGTH. The fact that it is superior to that of the other Forsaken females.
So, if RJ was somehow attempting to strip the Forsaken of their auras of greatness, would it not make much more sense to reduce Cyndane to the unfamiliar position of being weaker than some of her competitors among the Chosen?
I think it would fit the pattern.
But, as we've already said, we cannot be sure. After Sanderson's first, incorrect quote, we could place Cyndane below Nynaeve for sure.
After his partial retraction, we don't know how far we should move her up again. He still maintains she is significantly weakened. And his emphasis on the 6 women above Nynaeve did not tie up with his uncertainty regarding Cyndane. Basically, it does not seem as if she was one of the names among the 6, else he would surely not have made such an issue about her reduced status.
Anyway, until Sanderson clarifies what he meant, the debate can continue.
Where Semirhage's source of strength was her reputation as a torturer, and the fear this evoked in others, Lanfear's source of strength has always simply been her STRENGTH. The fact that it is superior to that of the other Forsaken females.
So, if RJ was somehow attempting to strip the Forsaken of their auras of greatness, would it not make much more sense to reduce Cyndane to the unfamiliar position of being weaker than some of her competitors among the Chosen?
I think it would fit the pattern.
But, as we've already said, we cannot be sure. After Sanderson's first, incorrect quote, we could place Cyndane below Nynaeve for sure.
After his partial retraction, we don't know how far we should move her up again. He still maintains she is significantly weakened. And his emphasis on the 6 women above Nynaeve did not tie up with his uncertainty regarding Cyndane. Basically, it does not seem as if she was one of the names among the 6, else he would surely not have made such an issue about her reduced status.
Anyway, until Sanderson clarifies what he meant, the debate can continue.
Female Forsaken strength : a new post
19/11/2009 04:12:35 PM
- 1721 Views
Except...
19/11/2009 04:26:32 PM
- 754 Views
There's no evidence for that
19/11/2009 04:31:17 PM
- 707 Views
I agree with Sidious - we have no evidence at this time, so she should remain off the list
19/11/2009 04:38:31 PM
- 714 Views
It's common sense
19/11/2009 04:40:01 PM
- 664 Views
No, it's based on absolutely nothing
19/11/2009 04:50:30 PM
- 727 Views
If you agree that there are stronger damane than Alivia...
19/11/2009 05:00:05 PM
- 648 Views
Glad to have you back. Now for the arguments to start!
19/11/2009 04:29:01 PM
- 763 Views
Hmm...
19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM
- 767 Views
Actually, you are the one placing Lanfear immensely high, my list reduced the strength difference...
19/11/2009 05:05:18 PM
- 836 Views
But I'm not
19/11/2009 05:17:05 PM
- 738 Views
Let me ask you this...
19/11/2009 10:13:12 PM
- 781 Views
All assumption
20/11/2009 04:11:20 AM
- 646 Views
Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance?
20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM
- 620 Views
You don't know the significance of it at all
20/11/2009 03:14:46 PM
- 736 Views
Why?
20/11/2009 03:17:51 PM
- 1258 Views
Re: Why?
20/11/2009 04:30:50 PM
- 604 Views
How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
20/11/2009 05:07:39 PM
- 644 Views
Re: How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
21/11/2009 10:55:47 AM
- 631 Views
Is Graendal the only Forsaken NOT to overstate her own ability then?
21/11/2009 01:53:28 PM
- 734 Views
Your rankings hinge ENTIRELY on whether you have Graendal correctly placed.
20/11/2009 03:24:22 PM
- 569 Views
Yeah... entirely
20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM
- 606 Views
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff08a/ff08a16a062d0619d5c6589e45a22f86d62ca23c" alt=""
What ever happened to all teh info from wotmania? Especially the FAQs? *NM*
19/11/2009 05:01:45 PM
- 418 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post
19/11/2009 05:39:10 PM
- 732 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post -- What about Dexterity??
19/11/2009 06:44:31 PM
- 736 Views
Seems good, except I'd bunch up the upper levels and place Nynaeve a little higher. *NM*
19/11/2009 09:46:16 PM
- 381 Views
Too many levels
20/11/2009 01:48:24 AM
- 725 Views
21 levels is largely a myth
20/11/2009 04:27:27 AM
- 612 Views
I have to disagree for a couple of reasons.
20/11/2009 04:14:40 AM
- 733 Views
I thought of something else to support my upper limit theory on gateways
20/11/2009 01:53:05 PM
- 725 Views
Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve
28/11/2009 08:27:22 PM
- 755 Views
more hopefully to come
20/11/2009 08:15:00 PM
- 589 Views
Thanks KCF, that's a great question to ask.
20/11/2009 08:28:32 PM
- 815 Views
I'm the same way. I should be studying for law school finals, but I'm distracted. *NM*
20/11/2009 09:45:46 PM
- 296 Views
I agree that Graendal is the 2nd most powerful woman Forsaken
29/11/2009 04:07:00 PM
- 578 Views