Active Users:604 Time:05/04/2025 08:46:49 AM
I agree with Etzel. Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM
It seems to me Graendal theory is finally dead. Frankly, I never liked this theory, and I specifically paid attention to the Asmo-death-related thingy in the books that I re-read in the last month. "Graendal dunn it" doesn't fit for me.

BTW, "Slayer dunn it" doesn't fit either
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1239 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 693 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 802 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 802 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 645 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 611 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 620 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 536 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 489 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 521 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 668 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 614 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 526 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 599 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 710 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 617 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 582 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 256 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 235 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 670 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 800 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 236 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 226 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 516 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 596 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 230 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 623 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 658 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 647 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 524 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 666 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 587 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 556 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 616 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 544 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 489 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 772 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 238 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 230 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 533 Views

Reply to Message