She's more or less forced to flee by Saerin's group, when she tells them that she is to answer the Supreme Council the next evening. Also, Alviarin remarks that Talene fails to follow this summons.
Am I evil? Yes I am!
The BA Hunters and their methodology (tGS spoilers)
19/11/2009 02:16:20 PM
- 874 Views
It probably has to be a direct betrayal
19/11/2009 02:53:19 PM
- 633 Views
Yup, totally.
19/11/2009 05:45:45 PM
- 534 Views
Possible reason for the loophole
19/11/2009 06:04:12 PM
- 571 Views
Re: Possible reason for the loophole
19/11/2009 06:36:21 PM
- 557 Views
Could be in that moment
19/11/2009 09:04:59 PM
- 486 Views
But the DO had Rand's mother - don't think she was a DF *NM*
21/11/2009 06:43:17 PM
- 227 Views
Could have been an illusion. We really know nothing of what happens to souls
24/12/2009 08:14:05 PM
- 449 Views
Re: It probably has to be a direct betrayal
19/11/2009 06:41:03 PM
- 573 Views
But wasn't Talene *forced* to do that?
19/11/2009 08:05:48 PM
- 596 Views
Yeah
19/11/2009 08:12:16 PM
- 542 Views
We know of Talene's escape earlier
19/11/2009 09:46:35 PM
- 487 Views
That and any oath on the Oath Rod relies very heavily on the swearer's interpretation of the oath.
19/11/2009 07:30:55 PM
- 494 Views
True. There's a scene where Cadsuane is told about Aiel in the city and she says "I hadn't noticed."
19/11/2009 08:21:52 PM
- 603 Views
Unless she's Black Ajah Just kidding.
19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM
- 496 Views
Maybe that's the real reason she's now taken to wearing a black hood! *NM*
19/11/2009 09:02:06 PM
- 198 Views
There's reason to believe that if any AS removed the Oaths from themselves, it's Cadsuane. *NM*
01/12/2009 04:44:00 PM
- 208 Views
Bigger loophole
21/11/2009 06:46:42 PM
- 514 Views
True, but again perspective seems to determine what is a lie and what isn't
21/11/2009 10:19:19 PM
- 427 Views