Active Users:302 Time:16/04/2025 11:30:06 PM
Could be in that moment Ryan Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 09:04:59 PM
When all seems lost, and they are making that sacrifice for the Light, they put themselves outside the Dark One's grip. Just an idea.
The past is just that, the past. You can only truly live by looking to the future!
Reply to message
The BA Hunters and their methodology (tGS spoilers) - 19/11/2009 02:16:20 PM 914 Views
It probably has to be a direct betrayal - 19/11/2009 02:53:19 PM 704 Views
Yup, totally. - 19/11/2009 05:45:45 PM 604 Views
Possible reason for the loophole - 19/11/2009 06:04:12 PM 654 Views
Re: Possible reason for the loophole - 19/11/2009 06:36:21 PM 641 Views
Could be in that moment - 19/11/2009 09:04:59 PM 560 Views
But the DO had Rand's mother - don't think she was a DF *NM* - 21/11/2009 06:43:17 PM 259 Views
-please delete this post- *NM* - 21/11/2009 06:46:04 PM 247 Views
-please delete this post- *NM* - 21/11/2009 06:47:40 PM 262 Views
Re: It probably has to be a direct betrayal - 19/11/2009 06:41:03 PM 641 Views
But wasn't Talene *forced* to do that? - 19/11/2009 08:05:48 PM 663 Views
Yeah - 19/11/2009 08:12:16 PM 620 Views
She's tortured - 19/11/2009 08:29:47 PM 666 Views
We know of Talene's escape earlier - 19/11/2009 09:46:35 PM 554 Views
That and any oath on the Oath Rod relies very heavily on the swearer's interpretation of the oath. - 19/11/2009 07:30:55 PM 562 Views
So George Costanza would make the perfect Aes Sedai? *NM* - 19/11/2009 07:40:06 PM 258 Views
*NM* - 19/11/2009 08:01:12 PM 233 Views
True. There's a scene where Cadsuane is told about Aiel in the city and she says "I hadn't noticed." - 19/11/2009 08:21:52 PM 674 Views
Unless she's Black Ajah Just kidding. - 19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM 570 Views
Yep. - 19/11/2009 10:43:11 PM 543 Views
Off with her head!!! - 19/11/2009 10:44:28 PM 534 Views
I was thinking... - 20/11/2009 03:20:32 AM 639 Views
Yes, but they probably asked "Have you ever been Black Ajah?" - 20/11/2009 03:24:48 AM 534 Views
Bigger loophole - 21/11/2009 06:46:42 PM 585 Views

Reply to Message