That and any oath on the Oath Rod relies very heavily on the swearer's interpretation of the oath.
Gher Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 07:30:55 PM
Basically, if an Aes Sedai can justify it to themselves, they can do it. Any Aes Sedai could lie, and tell themselves that each single word they say is true. They have as much leeway as they can give themselves.
"And it breaks my heart to look around, and see the unimpressed; who can't believe the emperor is dressed"~Fastball
2-7-1
2-7-1
The BA Hunters and their methodology (tGS spoilers)
19/11/2009 02:16:20 PM
- 887 Views
It probably has to be a direct betrayal
19/11/2009 02:53:19 PM
- 650 Views
Yup, totally.
19/11/2009 05:45:45 PM
- 549 Views
Possible reason for the loophole
19/11/2009 06:04:12 PM
- 584 Views
Re: Possible reason for the loophole
19/11/2009 06:36:21 PM
- 568 Views
Could be in that moment
19/11/2009 09:04:59 PM
- 500 Views
But the DO had Rand's mother - don't think she was a DF *NM*
21/11/2009 06:43:17 PM
- 233 Views
Could have been an illusion. We really know nothing of what happens to souls
24/12/2009 08:14:05 PM
- 458 Views
Re: It probably has to be a direct betrayal
19/11/2009 06:41:03 PM
- 586 Views
But wasn't Talene *forced* to do that?
19/11/2009 08:05:48 PM
- 609 Views
That and any oath on the Oath Rod relies very heavily on the swearer's interpretation of the oath.
19/11/2009 07:30:55 PM
- 507 Views
True. There's a scene where Cadsuane is told about Aiel in the city and she says "I hadn't noticed."
19/11/2009 08:21:52 PM
- 616 Views
Unless she's Black Ajah Just kidding.
19/11/2009 08:59:49 PM
- 507 Views
Maybe that's the real reason she's now taken to wearing a black hood! *NM*
19/11/2009 09:02:06 PM
- 202 Views
There's reason to believe that if any AS removed the Oaths from themselves, it's Cadsuane. *NM*
01/12/2009 04:44:00 PM
- 211 Views
Bigger loophole
21/11/2009 06:46:42 PM
- 526 Views
True, but again perspective seems to determine what is a lie and what isn't
21/11/2009 10:19:19 PM
- 440 Views