Active Users:560 Time:15/11/2024 02:50:47 PM
This is silly guttering flame Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM
why are you deliberately misrepresenting him in your arguments and instead hang your arguments on definitions?

Be satisfied with saying that those forsaken got timeouts from the story and often got demoted as well when they returned.

People reborn the ordinary way need 16 years to reenter the game, by which time they would become irrelevancies since this fight is going to be decided in the next few months.

When you start using words from our world for things that are just different you get contradictions. Better to coin a new term that really means what it means.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1255 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 790 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 420 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 279 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 767 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 574 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 694 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 614 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 597 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 528 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 630 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 581 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 532 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 608 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 531 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 747 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 596 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 553 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 357 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 684 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 528 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 278 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 338 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 569 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 500 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 525 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 467 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 513 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 517 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 556 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 483 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 480 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 639 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 512 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 511 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 482 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 686 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 566 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 625 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 563 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 546 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 657 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 765 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 462 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 535 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 511 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 634 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 479 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 254 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 505 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 464 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 567 Views

Reply to Message