Active Users:927 Time:16/09/2025 10:37:26 AM
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post -- What about Dexterity?? Tedtheman Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 06:44:31 PM
I decided to make a new post because there are over a hundred views in the previous post and it's getting crowded. Thanks to Shannow and all the debating there - I loved all the bickering.


I love how the post had DEFINITIVE in all caps, but it's full of hemming and hawing and maybes and arguing.

Let me start off by saying that Brandon seems like a nice guy, but he shoots from the hip. He's answering things incorrectly and causing all manner of scandals. If we didn't know better about Cyndane, we'd all be in a fuss, but he's making major errors in his answers. I also find it very unlikely that the guy knows the strength tree to any reasonable degree. I'm sure he knows some landmarks, but his own words show that he's 'reasonably' this 'pretty sure' that. It's all very vague and unreliable information. It would actually be better to get a RAFO than to get wrong information based on guessing.


He may have access to things we do not, but when he is unable to look at that information, he's a lot like the rest of us. A fan who is fallible and prone to error when trying to explain minutiae from memory. I have a theory about his "little detail from books 4-6" that addresses this in part as well.

As for the OP rankings, I'm not sold on anybody's list so far.


I agree, because mostly it seems that the list has changed as the series went on, sometimes as the wind blows. Nynaeve went from "Holy crap" to "LOL so last year" back to "OMG didn't you know shes badass?".

I don't ever remember reading about the two Nynaeve strength lists (before\after or whatever) as a comment from RJ on wotmania, but I think that illustrates how other relative strengths may have changed.

I'm still harping on it but I hate that the whole Dexterity side seems to have gone by the wayside.
Reply to message
Female Forsaken strength : a new post - 19/11/2009 04:12:35 PM 1803 Views
Except... - 19/11/2009 04:26:32 PM 833 Views
There's no evidence for that - 19/11/2009 04:31:17 PM 785 Views
It's common sense - 19/11/2009 04:40:01 PM 735 Views
No, it's based on absolutely nothing - 19/11/2009 04:50:30 PM 803 Views
If you agree that there are stronger damane than Alivia... - 19/11/2009 05:00:05 PM 726 Views
I didn't say that - 19/11/2009 05:07:33 PM 739 Views
Well, I think you are wrong... - 19/11/2009 05:35:27 PM 727 Views
Glad to have you back. Now for the arguments to start! - 19/11/2009 04:29:01 PM 846 Views
Hmm... - 19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM 848 Views
Actually, you are the one placing Lanfear immensely high, my list reduced the strength difference... - 19/11/2009 05:05:18 PM 926 Views
But I'm not - 19/11/2009 05:17:05 PM 828 Views
Let me ask you this... - 19/11/2009 10:13:12 PM 863 Views
Very good point *NM* - 20/11/2009 01:38:55 AM 372 Views
One possibility - 20/11/2009 03:18:55 AM 802 Views
All assumption - 20/11/2009 04:11:20 AM 731 Views
Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance? - 20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM 696 Views
You don't know the significance of it at all - 20/11/2009 03:14:46 PM 814 Views
Why? - 20/11/2009 03:17:51 PM 1341 Views
Re: Why? - 20/11/2009 04:30:50 PM 684 Views
How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)... - 20/11/2009 05:07:39 PM 723 Views
Re: How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)... - 21/11/2009 10:55:47 AM 719 Views
Is Graendal the only Forsaken NOT to overstate her own ability then? - 21/11/2009 01:53:28 PM 820 Views
Probably not in this case - 21/11/2009 11:34:25 PM 697 Views
Your rankings hinge ENTIRELY on whether you have Graendal correctly placed. - 20/11/2009 03:24:22 PM 674 Views
Yeah... entirely - 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM 681 Views
Okay, "entirely" was a bad choice of word. - 20/11/2009 09:57:52 PM 691 Views
Re: Okay, "entirely" was a bad choice of word. - 21/11/2009 10:48:16 AM 765 Views
Re: Let me ask you this... - 23/12/2009 04:30:27 PM 735 Views
*correction*Re: Let me ask you this... - 23/12/2009 04:32:02 PM 714 Views
my comments w/ edit - 19/11/2009 04:37:27 PM 781 Views
Re: my comments w/ edit - 19/11/2009 04:54:30 PM 840 Views
Re: my comments w/ edit - 23/12/2009 04:42:15 PM 654 Views
What ever happened to all teh info from wotmania? Especially the FAQs? *NM* - 19/11/2009 05:01:45 PM 528 Views
http://13depository.blogspot.com/ *NM* - 19/11/2009 05:31:01 PM 382 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post - 19/11/2009 05:39:10 PM 810 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post -- What about Dexterity?? - 19/11/2009 06:44:31 PM 818 Views
This perfectly matches my understanding of the situation. - 19/11/2009 07:06:31 PM 677 Views
Agreed! This make more sense than the previous list *NM* - 20/11/2009 12:07:37 AM 420 Views
Too many levels - 20/11/2009 01:48:24 AM 796 Views
You are completely right about too many levels. - 20/11/2009 04:17:17 AM 690 Views
21 levels is largely a myth - 20/11/2009 04:27:27 AM 692 Views
Re: 21 levels is largely a myth - 20/11/2009 01:51:17 PM 827 Views
Thanks for the post. Interesting stuff there. *NM* - 20/11/2009 03:14:12 PM 350 Views
That's good to know. - 20/11/2009 07:56:41 PM 664 Views
I have to disagree for a couple of reasons. - 20/11/2009 04:14:40 AM 823 Views
Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve - 28/11/2009 08:27:22 PM 875 Views
Re: Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve - 28/11/2009 10:05:15 PM 927 Views
Talaan has be channeling for 6 or 7 years - 28/11/2009 10:56:12 PM 723 Views
Re: I have to disagree for a couple of reasons. - 30/12/2009 12:37:40 AM 1146 Views
Agree with nearly all - 20/11/2009 04:43:47 AM 688 Views
more hopefully to come - 20/11/2009 08:15:00 PM 668 Views
Thanks KCF, that's a great question to ask. - 20/11/2009 08:28:32 PM 907 Views
A little more evidence that Nynaeve is stronger than Semirhage - 29/11/2009 12:12:37 AM 689 Views
I agree that Graendal is the 2nd most powerful woman Forsaken - 29/11/2009 04:07:00 PM 655 Views
It's possible - 30/11/2009 08:23:28 PM 702 Views
Re: It's possible - 01/12/2009 06:18:56 PM 775 Views

Reply to Message