Of course at least some of them are hold by the Empress or Tuon, because as the rulers of Seanchan they naturally have the privileges to get these damane. They also have e.g. the best fighters and the most powerful ter'angreal. Since a super strong damane would be very helpful for Tuon on her war, it furthermore simply makes sense that Sera is one of these super strong. Therefore any list ignoring Sera is most likely wrong, IMO.
But as said, maybe BS will clarify it.
But as said, maybe BS will clarify it.
Alivia is the strongest damane we know. There may or may not be a damane or some damane who equal or exceed her. We might never know.
Tuon said that Sera was the strongest of her damane - out of six in attendance. To make the leap that Sera is high Forsaken strength is illogical IMO. Egwene was special enough that they wanted to present her to the Empress for her abilities. It doesn't mean she's Lanfear.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
Female Forsaken strength : a new post
19/11/2009 04:12:35 PM
- 1654 Views
Except...
19/11/2009 04:26:32 PM
- 698 Views
There's no evidence for that
19/11/2009 04:31:17 PM
- 651 Views
I agree with Sidious - we have no evidence at this time, so she should remain off the list
19/11/2009 04:38:31 PM
- 654 Views
It's common sense
19/11/2009 04:40:01 PM
- 632 Views
No, it's based on absolutely nothing
19/11/2009 04:50:30 PM
- 667 Views
If you agree that there are stronger damane than Alivia...
19/11/2009 05:00:05 PM
- 591 Views
I didn't say that
19/11/2009 05:07:33 PM
- 606 Views
Glad to have you back. Now for the arguments to start!
19/11/2009 04:29:01 PM
- 707 Views
Hmm...
19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM
- 709 Views
Actually, you are the one placing Lanfear immensely high, my list reduced the strength difference...
19/11/2009 05:05:18 PM
- 777 Views
But I'm not
19/11/2009 05:17:05 PM
- 685 Views
Let me ask you this...
19/11/2009 10:13:12 PM
- 730 Views
All assumption
20/11/2009 04:11:20 AM
- 580 Views
Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance?
20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM
- 565 Views
You don't know the significance of it at all
20/11/2009 03:14:46 PM
- 676 Views
Why?
20/11/2009 03:17:51 PM
- 1200 Views
Re: Why?
20/11/2009 04:30:50 PM
- 547 Views
How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
20/11/2009 05:07:39 PM
- 585 Views
Re: How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
21/11/2009 10:55:47 AM
- 573 Views
Is Graendal the only Forsaken NOT to overstate her own ability then?
21/11/2009 01:53:28 PM
- 679 Views
Your rankings hinge ENTIRELY on whether you have Graendal correctly placed.
20/11/2009 03:24:22 PM
- 524 Views
Yeah... entirely
20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM
- 543 Views
What ever happened to all teh info from wotmania? Especially the FAQs? *NM*
19/11/2009 05:01:45 PM
- 396 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post
19/11/2009 05:39:10 PM
- 662 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post -- What about Dexterity??
19/11/2009 06:44:31 PM
- 674 Views
Seems good, except I'd bunch up the upper levels and place Nynaeve a little higher. *NM*
19/11/2009 09:46:16 PM
- 353 Views
Too many levels
20/11/2009 01:48:24 AM
- 675 Views
21 levels is largely a myth
20/11/2009 04:27:27 AM
- 555 Views
I have to disagree for a couple of reasons.
20/11/2009 04:14:40 AM
- 665 Views
I thought of something else to support my upper limit theory on gateways
20/11/2009 01:53:05 PM
- 661 Views
Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve
28/11/2009 08:27:22 PM
- 691 Views
more hopefully to come
20/11/2009 08:15:00 PM
- 534 Views
Thanks KCF, that's a great question to ask.
20/11/2009 08:28:32 PM
- 758 Views
I'm the same way. I should be studying for law school finals, but I'm distracted. *NM*
20/11/2009 09:45:46 PM
- 274 Views
I agree that Graendal is the 2nd most powerful woman Forsaken
29/11/2009 04:07:00 PM
- 521 Views