Active Users:761 Time:15/11/2024 03:24:47 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
They are politicians at heart... everynametaken Send a noteboard - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM
I'm half way through tGS and something popped into my mind.....what is the point of the Aes Sedai? Are they comic relief? Are they just filler?

So, yes and yes. :D

Have the Aes Sedai contributed anything major to the storyline? Have they discovered any knowledge about the Last Battle to help Rand? Have they helped with any of the conflicts among nations/factions to help bring order to Randland prior to the Last Battle? Have they even captured or killed a Forsaken? They just keep fighting among themselves.....what's the point!

They've screwed a lot of obvious stuff up.
Why would they ever choose past history as an example of what might happen now?
Nope, they've just exacerbated problems in other nations.
Neg-a-tivo on the actually capturing a bad guy/girl (well I guess Nynaeve capturing Moghedien is technically a win, but she wasn't Aes Sedai at the time was she? But, eventually they lost the two they had!
Partisanship is a nasty thing. :P

Thoughts?

See! Perfect politicians! :D


Hmm, my repely had nm for some reason.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
This message last edited by everynametaken on 17/11/2009 at 06:59:49 AM
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... trzaska2000 - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1256 Views
They are politicians at heart... everynametaken - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 791 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* fionwe1987 - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 420 Views
Cadsuane hasn't done anything and Moiraine.....you mean that person from 7 books ago? trzaska2000 - 17/11/2009 05:51:16 AM 587 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* ajfurst - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 279 Views
What use have the Andorans been then? As a nation, not individuals. *NM* fionwe1987 - 17/11/2009 06:53:35 AM 292 Views
Not much - of all plots in WOT I wish Daughter Heir had meant Heir, not Daughter of the Heir *NM* ajfurst - 18/11/2009 08:54:18 AM 289 Views
She is the Heir, not the daughter of the heir! *NM* fionwe1987 - 18/11/2009 05:24:24 PM 304 Views
As we found out, in painfully slow manner, she was neither! *NM* BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 01:31:02 PM 286 Views
Short answer: nope. Marshall - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 768 Views
Good answer.....so why are so many stories devoted to those that are only indirectly..... trzaska2000 - 17/11/2009 05:54:10 AM 576 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 575 Views
rather.. urizen - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 694 Views
I think those critiques are overblown and not based on a fair analaysis of WoT History RugbyPlayingAshaman - 18/11/2009 03:15:12 PM 648 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. Onarishma - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 614 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. urizen - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 597 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine Onarishma - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 529 Views
But then.. urizen - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 631 Views
Kind of Sort of fairfax - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 582 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... Onarishma - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 533 Views
AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims redhand - 17/11/2009 09:31:24 AM 1978 Views
Re: AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims Watcher - 17/11/2009 12:44:35 PM 1353 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... LewsTherin10 - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 608 Views
Always help or contribute.....never do or lead..... trzaska2000 - 17/11/2009 04:23:04 PM 544 Views
if that internal silliness is not resolved the power of a united front will remain compromised. *NM* Onarishma - 17/11/2009 11:11:54 PM 339 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 532 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... LewsTherin10 - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 749 Views
You're asking the wrong question HyogaRott - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 597 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group NaClH2O - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 553 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* trzaska2000 - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 358 Views
Scored using your words NaClH2O - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 685 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... trzaska2000 - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 529 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* Marshall - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 279 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* fionwe1987 - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 339 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... trzaska2000 - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 569 Views
They reduced her in power. TheCrownless - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 500 Views
Perhaps 1/32th of a point.....she's still almost as powerful as any other woman..... trzaska2000 - 19/11/2009 01:00:26 AM 583 Views
So? fionwe1987 - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 526 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 468 Views
Have you read the books? NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 514 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... trzaska2000 - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 517 Views
So? fionwe1987 - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 557 Views
Oh dear! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 483 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... trzaska2000 - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 480 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 639 Views
This is silly guttering flame - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 512 Views
There is no misrepresentation NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 512 Views
The point I made is guttering flame - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 483 Views
Are we speaking english? NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 686 Views
Not really BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 567 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 626 Views
OK NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 564 Views
No idea BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 547 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 657 Views
Well what do you think of BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 766 Views
And another point NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 463 Views
For the sake of argument, though BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 535 Views
OK fair enough NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 512 Views
rAndy aL - 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 635 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? trzaska2000 - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 479 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* fionwe1987 - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 254 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... trzaska2000 - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 506 Views
Yeah right... fionwe1987 - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 465 Views
Yes, seriously rAndy aL - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 568 Views
It's kind of amusing to see the prima donas bow and scrape before each other while the world ends. BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 01:37:42 PM 514 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes