Active Users:1147 Time:22/11/2024 01:53:57 PM
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory Sidious Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM

A: "Brandon had been a fan for a long time before he got to find out who killed Asmodean. He said that he had heard arguments for every possible suspect, including the really crazy ones like Tam. So when he found out the real answer, he wasn’t shocked. His reaction was more 'Oh, those guys were right'. He said that the clues are there, but he never would have figured it out himself."

That's pretty much Graendal if you ask me. Most readers will be shocked to find out its Slayer. It's as likely as finding out Moiraine did it.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1175 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 620 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 728 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 736 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 573 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 542 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 548 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 464 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 418 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 446 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 592 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 541 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 450 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 519 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 639 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 531 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 511 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 223 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 209 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 607 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 730 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 213 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 197 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 450 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 521 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 208 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 556 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 580 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 571 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 450 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 597 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 512 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 489 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 544 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 470 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 426 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 704 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 208 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 199 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 455 Views

Reply to Message