Active Users:1216 Time:22/11/2024 01:39:59 PM
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... kcf Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM
This lends no weight to any of the 'major' suspects in my opinion. Only that minor suspects are less likely (and frankly, I consider Slayer a minor suspect, so if anything it takes away from that theory)
Need a good book to read? Visit Neth Space - a SFF review and discussion blog.

http://nethspace.blogspot.com/
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1175 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 620 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 727 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 736 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 573 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 542 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 548 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 464 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 417 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 445 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 592 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 541 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 449 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 519 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 639 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 531 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 511 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 223 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 209 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 607 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 730 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 213 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 197 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 450 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 521 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 208 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 556 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 579 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 570 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 450 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 596 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 511 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 489 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 543 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 470 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 426 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 704 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 207 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 199 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 454 Views

Reply to Message