Active Users:332 Time:05/04/2025 03:02:49 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
That's wrong Etzel Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM
It's been common knowledge that Sanderson will reveal Asmodean's killer. It's also been common knowledge that Graendal will be in the next book due to the fact that the time lines are not all caught up to the same point. The fact that Graendal is likely dead does not affect her ability to reveal herself as Asmodean's killer in a POV from Graendal in the next book. This has been settled for some time.


BS said that Graendal will at least be mentioned in ToM. And that at the end of the book we will now, if Graendal has died or not.

Besides that, BS obviously means with the timeline issue that he will bring Perrin's, Mat's, Elayne's and some others plotlines forward, because they are behind Rand's and Egwene's timeline. Graendal is in Rand's plotline, though, and therefore up-to-date, so to speak. Therefore nothing suggestes and it doesn't make much sense that she will have another PoV.
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory Etzel - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1239 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. Tom - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 691 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... ursidae - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 802 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal Jim - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 801 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 645 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. TaskmasterJack - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 611 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV Etzel - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 620 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. Tom - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 536 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it Etzel - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 488 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. Tom - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 521 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... Etzel - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 668 Views
I'm sure you can see... Legolas - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 614 Views
Well... Etzel - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 526 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. Tom - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 599 Views
That's wrong Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 710 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. Tom - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 617 Views
right here Jim - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 582 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM* Tom - 15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM 261 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 256 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* Tom - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 234 Views
Etzel - 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 669 Views
BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM* Etzel - 14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM 250 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 800 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 236 Views
Agreed. *NM* Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 226 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all beetnemesis - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 516 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... kcf - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 596 Views
Agreed *NM* Sidious - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 230 Views
I disagree... Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 622 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. lord-of-shadow - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 656 Views
Personally... Legolas - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 647 Views
I think... Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 524 Views
No. Try again. everynametaken - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 666 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you! *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM 232 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory Sidious - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 587 Views
Nonsense... Etzel - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 556 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. Legolas - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 616 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... Etzel - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 544 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... Sidious - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 489 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 772 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* Mjolner - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 238 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* Ryan - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 230 Views
I agree with Etzel. Skeeve the Great - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 532 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes