Active Users:1096 Time:22/11/2024 01:15:17 PM
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory Etzel Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM
Dragonmount reported from a recent signing the following Q&A:

Q: "Were you surprised when you found out who killed Asmodean?"

A: "Brandon had been a fan for a long time before he got to find out who killed Asmodean. He said that he had heard arguments for every possible suspect, including the really crazy ones like Tam. So when he found out the real answer, he wasn’t shocked. His reaction was more 'Oh, those guys were right'. He said that the clues are there, but he never would have figured it out himself."

This surprise ("Oh, those guys were right" ) clearly speaks against the idea that the "obvious" suspect of the majority of the WoT fans, Graendal, killed Asmo. Of course, Graendal's death already made it most unlikely.

And btw, Tam is apparently also excluded..
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1175 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 619 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 727 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 735 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 572 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 541 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 548 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 463 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 417 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 445 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 592 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 540 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 449 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 519 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 638 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 530 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 510 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 223 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 209 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 607 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 729 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 212 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 196 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 449 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 520 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 207 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 556 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 579 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 570 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 450 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 596 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 511 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 488 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 543 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 470 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 426 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 704 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 207 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 199 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 454 Views

Reply to Message