Active Users:1175 Time:22/11/2024 06:35:01 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* TheCrownless Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM
Come to the dark side, We have candy!

I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
Reply to message
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM 1581 Views
You should include quotes TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM 766 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM 823 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Watcher - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM 749 Views
Sure, I agree... Shannow - 12/11/2009 12:45:33 PM 691 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM 729 Views
Please elaborate... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM 734 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM 688 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once. Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM 711 Views
How generous of you. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 07:51:54 PM 789 Views
Scrap that TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM 699 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle Insomdeon - 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM 871 Views
There is no basis for that conclusion... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:02:37 PM 741 Views
I could have sprayed TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM 702 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM 850 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM 328 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM* Blaine - 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM 363 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal... Shannow - 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM 765 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM 757 Views
Wrong place *ignore* Sidious - 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM 660 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory? TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM 645 Views
I do *NM* Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM 288 Views
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM 303 Views
Re: Wrong place *ignore* taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:14:51 PM 688 Views
sa'angreal and angreal are only different in terms of the magnitude of their effects *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 06:56:43 PM 325 Views
Re: Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? TheUltimateReality - 12/11/2009 07:48:37 PM 733 Views
You are missing two important points PatAtt - 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM 852 Views
Response to both points... Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:57:11 PM 750 Views
In fact, I've just read the actual report, and Sanderson didn't say anything near what you quoted. Shannow - 12/11/2009 06:06:39 PM 652 Views
Re: Look at how similar descriptions of angreal and Sa'angreal affects are in the books. Tedtheman - 12/11/2009 07:34:16 PM 701 Views
I completely agree with you Shannow Marshall - 12/11/2009 07:01:29 PM 680 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics" Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM 1141 Views
Oh, also Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM 717 Views
As long as you reference him, I doubt he'd mind. *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 08:36:59 PM 317 Views
there's a slight problem with your theory Jim - 12/11/2009 08:19:25 PM 619 Views
Probably Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM 1038 Views
Agreed, with one point Marshall - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM 649 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... fionwe1987 - 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM 657 Views
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt Ryan - 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM 673 Views
Re: Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:00:15 PM 563 Views
Re: Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:11:34 PM 662 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM 605 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM 628 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes