Active Users:504 Time:27/12/2024 11:53:02 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
sa'angreal and angreal are only different in terms of the magnitude of their effects *NM* Marshall Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 06:56:43 PM
Reply to message
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM 1596 Views
You should include quotes TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM 783 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM 839 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Watcher - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM 767 Views
Sure, I agree... Shannow - 12/11/2009 12:45:33 PM 708 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM 743 Views
Please elaborate... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM 746 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM 701 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once. Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM 726 Views
How generous of you. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 07:51:54 PM 802 Views
Scrap that TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM 715 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle Insomdeon - 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM 887 Views
There is no basis for that conclusion... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:02:37 PM 759 Views
I could have sprayed TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM 719 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM 866 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM 334 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM* Blaine - 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM 370 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal... Shannow - 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM 780 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM 778 Views
Wrong place *ignore* Sidious - 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM 677 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory? TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM 663 Views
I do *NM* Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM 293 Views
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM 310 Views
Re: Wrong place *ignore* taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:14:51 PM 699 Views
sa'angreal and angreal are only different in terms of the magnitude of their effects *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 06:56:43 PM 332 Views
Re: Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? TheUltimateReality - 12/11/2009 07:48:37 PM 750 Views
You are missing two important points PatAtt - 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM 868 Views
Response to both points... Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:57:11 PM 768 Views
In fact, I've just read the actual report, and Sanderson didn't say anything near what you quoted. Shannow - 12/11/2009 06:06:39 PM 667 Views
Re: Look at how similar descriptions of angreal and Sa'angreal affects are in the books. Tedtheman - 12/11/2009 07:34:16 PM 718 Views
I completely agree with you Shannow Marshall - 12/11/2009 07:01:29 PM 695 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics" Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM 1153 Views
Oh, also Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM 732 Views
As long as you reference him, I doubt he'd mind. *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 08:36:59 PM 322 Views
there's a slight problem with your theory Jim - 12/11/2009 08:19:25 PM 634 Views
Probably Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM 1054 Views
Agreed, with one point Marshall - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM 666 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... fionwe1987 - 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM 673 Views
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt Ryan - 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM 688 Views
Re: Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:00:15 PM 578 Views
Re: Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:11:34 PM 679 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM 624 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM 642 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes