Active Users:1017 Time:17/09/2026 08:01:24 PM
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM
I just say it makes no sense.. ;)
At least in my opinion.

BS obviously means that the other plotlines, which are behind Rand's and Egwene's, will be brought to the same point in ToM, namely Perrin, Mat, Elayne, likely Aviendha, Lan, Loial, Fain, etc.

However, Graendal was tied to Rand's plotline, which isn't behind in the timeline, but was pretty much concluded in TGS for now. As far as we know, Graendal has no relevance in the plotlines of the others, because she had to concentrate on Rand to fulfill Moridin's orders (Graendal even says in TGS that she doesn't care about the other two ta'veren). Since ToM will - according to BS - anyway be a less focused book than TGS (probably because there are more plotlines), it makes no sense for BS to confuse the readers even more about the timeline by giving a likely redundant PoV from Graendal before her death (and AFAIK, something like this was never done in the series). As BS indicated, other characters will just mention Graendal in ToM.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 2082 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 1016 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 1062 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 537 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 1066 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 1060 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1109 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1088 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 1024 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 935 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 897 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 962 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 938 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 944 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 900 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 976 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 922 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 975 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 947 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 920 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 960 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 967 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 979 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 1065 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 1040 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 969 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 922 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 972 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 1010 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 878 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 854 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 907 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 962 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 481 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 1000 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 472 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 876 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 930 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 473 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 966 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 885 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 935 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 913 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 932 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 451 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 405 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 936 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 922 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 864 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 913 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 471 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 893 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 442 Views

Reply to Message