I just say it makes no sense.. 
At least in my opinion.
BS obviously means that the other plotlines, which are behind Rand's and Egwene's, will be brought to the same point in ToM, namely Perrin, Mat, Elayne, likely Aviendha, Lan, Loial, Fain, etc.
However, Graendal was tied to Rand's plotline, which isn't behind in the timeline, but was pretty much concluded in TGS for now. As far as we know, Graendal has no relevance in the plotlines of the others, because she had to concentrate on Rand to fulfill Moridin's orders (Graendal even says in TGS that she doesn't care about the other two ta'veren). Since ToM will - according to BS - anyway be a less focused book than TGS (probably because there are more plotlines), it makes no sense for BS to confuse the readers even more about the timeline by giving a likely redundant PoV from Graendal before her death (and AFAIK, something like this was never done in the series). As BS indicated, other characters will just mention Graendal in ToM.

At least in my opinion.
BS obviously means that the other plotlines, which are behind Rand's and Egwene's, will be brought to the same point in ToM, namely Perrin, Mat, Elayne, likely Aviendha, Lan, Loial, Fain, etc.
However, Graendal was tied to Rand's plotline, which isn't behind in the timeline, but was pretty much concluded in TGS for now. As far as we know, Graendal has no relevance in the plotlines of the others, because she had to concentrate on Rand to fulfill Moridin's orders (Graendal even says in TGS that she doesn't care about the other two ta'veren). Since ToM will - according to BS - anyway be a less focused book than TGS (probably because there are more plotlines), it makes no sense for BS to confuse the readers even more about the timeline by giving a likely redundant PoV from Graendal before her death (and AFAIK, something like this was never done in the series). As BS indicated, other characters will just mention Graendal in ToM.
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
- 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM
1900 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not.
- 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM
843 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM*
- 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM
451 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not.
- 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM
882 Views
It eliminates for the following
- 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM
897 Views
That's quite a leap of logic...
- 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM
958 Views
I can't follow your logic
- 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM
738 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic.
- 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM
808 Views
your interpretation is wrong
- 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM
801 Views
I generally agree...
- 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM
877 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM
810 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM
711 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM
773 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way.
- 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM
792 Views
This logic is lacking as well
- 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM
849 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
- 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM
801 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM*
- 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM
415 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired?
- 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM
730 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired!
- 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM
844 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM*
- 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM
400 Views
What? Did you double post?
- 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM
720 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process
*NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
371 Views
*NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
371 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible
- 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM
764 Views
I don't say it's impossible...
- 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM
804 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM
389 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back.
- 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM
778 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite
- 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM
775 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time.
- 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM
719 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM*
- 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM
391 Views
