Active Users:466 Time:01/11/2024 01:46:49 AM
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM
I will follow your conditions and prove that Graendal CAN STILL REVEAL HERSELF TO BE THE KILLER!
There are several ways to do this.
1a: Off scene. Graendal talks to Cyndane and says I killed Asmo. Sometime later Cyndane says "Graendal said she killed Asmo" bingo.
1b: Same scenario but a bit different, Flash back to Cyndane meeting with Graendal. Graendal says "I have killed Asmo".
2: Even more likely in my opinion is that tGS and ToM have parallel timelines for a while. This is extremely likely in my opinion there are many things that need to be explained that have already happened (Galad meeting Perrin, Mat in Caemlyn). It would make perfect sense to have ToM cover some of the same time as tGS. In the some time frame (before Granny gets it) we see and hear Graendal saying "I killed asmo"

NaCl(many many different ways for that to happen)H2O +<img class=' />


But I find it likely, and not ridiculous.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1641 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 625 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 691 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 331 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 597 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 631 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 738 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 684 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 645 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 553 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 541 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 561 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 568 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 565 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 520 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 602 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 554 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 570 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 542 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 525 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 584 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 560 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 560 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 645 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 624 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 600 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 483 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 561 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 604 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 476 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 474 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 518 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 576 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 303 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 610 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 289 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 497 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 545 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 277 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 544 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 489 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 573 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 531 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 530 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 256 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 237 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 525 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 531 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 486 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 516 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 280 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 497 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 231 Views

Reply to Message