Active Users:354 Time:09/04/2025 09:27:06 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Logical? Naiowen Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM
Sorry, no. That's not logical. Just because we haven't seen Graendal reveal herself as the killer does not mean that she did not kill Asmodean. As has been stated, TGS and ToM may run paralell for a time so we don't know anything for sure.

Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1738 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 712 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 784 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 370 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 698 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 725 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 833 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 788 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 734 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 622 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 636 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 656 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 653 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 665 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 621 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 701 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 647 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 661 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 642 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 622 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 681 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 653 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 660 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 744 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 691 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 701 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 618 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 658 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 594 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 660 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 668 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 696 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 559 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 558 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 613 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 672 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 343 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 562 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 692 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 330 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 591 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 313 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 640 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 321 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 651 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 578 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 673 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 618 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 622 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 328 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 299 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 279 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 611 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 634 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 625 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 577 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 607 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 323 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 589 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 314 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 589 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 272 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes