I think you're making quite a large leap in logic. Mainly because we have no way of knowing how this information would be conveyed or even if it would be conveyed.
In addition, in order for your leap to make any sense, we'd need to know if Graendal is dead or not, because quite simply, if she wasn't in the palace when the balefire stream hit it, she could still turn up and reveal herself as Asmodean's killer.
Even more damning to your claim is that Sanderson doesn't ever state whether or not Graendal is dead, let alone who Asmodean's killer is.
Sorry, but your claim just doesn't hold up.
In addition, in order for your leap to make any sense, we'd need to know if Graendal is dead or not, because quite simply, if she wasn't in the palace when the balefire stream hit it, she could still turn up and reveal herself as Asmodean's killer.
Even more damning to your claim is that Sanderson doesn't ever state whether or not Graendal is dead, let alone who Asmodean's killer is.
Sorry, but your claim just doesn't hold up.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
- 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM
1737 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not.
- 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM
708 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM*
- 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM
369 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not.
- 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM
696 Views
It eliminates for the following
- 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM
721 Views
That's quite a leap of logic...
- 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM
831 Views
I can't follow your logic
- 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM
618 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic.
- 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM
659 Views
Yes, but...
- 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM
641 Views
That is still erroneous.
- 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM
620 Views
your interpretation is wrong
- 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM
680 Views
I generally agree...
- 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM
743 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM
657 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM
591 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM
657 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way.
- 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM
665 Views
This logic is lacking as well
- 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM
692 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
- 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM
669 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM*
- 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM
342 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired?
- 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM
558 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired!
- 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM
689 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM*
- 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM
330 Views
What? Did you double post?
- 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM
588 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process 
*NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
313 Views
*NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
313 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible
- 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM
637 Views
I don't say it's impossible...
- 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM
645 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM
327 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back.
- 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM
610 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite
- 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM
631 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time.
- 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM
585 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM*
- 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM
312 Views