Active Users:468 Time:13/12/2025 04:30:09 PM
Two Things TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM
1) All he said that was busted was that Graendal being balefired wouldn't undo Asmodean's death even if she were the killer. As those above have let you know, you misinterpreted.

2) Jordan has gone on record to say that one balefire cannot undo another balefire. It wouldn't matter if they were seconds apart. If Person A balefires Person B and then Person A is immediately balefired themself, the previously balefired Person B does not come back to life. He's been asked about this.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1892 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 838 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 905 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 446 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 876 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 893 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 950 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 928 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 871 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 768 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 754 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 782 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 780 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 778 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 729 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 820 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 782 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 804 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 774 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 749 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 796 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 784 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 794 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 874 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 827 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 808 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 745 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 804 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 839 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 708 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 674 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 733 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 794 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 413 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 835 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 397 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 715 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 761 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 395 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 797 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 708 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 782 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 753 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 746 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 371 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 331 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 769 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 760 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 706 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 752 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 399 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 733 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 356 Views

Reply to Message