Active Users:1045 Time:02/11/2025 03:26:20 AM
Re: Logain Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM
Graendal cannot comment later that she killed Asmodean if she is dead by balefire.

There is a theory out there that we might see Asmodean reappear in the series, based on the assumption that Graendal could have been burnt out far enough back to undo Asmodean's death.

The logic goes like this:

1. No character has yet revealed themselves as Asmodean's killer.
2. Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer because she died by balefire.
3. The only possible way to still implicate Graendal as Asmodean's killer is if somehow Asmodean were to reappear in the series (i.e. if Graendal were the killer and she was balefired back far enough, then Asmo might reappear)
4. Because Brandon says it is impossible to burn Graendal out that far back, it is impossible the balefiring of Graendal will cause Asmodean to reappear.
5. Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing).

Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1865 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 815 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 878 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 427 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 841 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 837 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 929 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 905 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 835 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 724 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 727 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 755 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 754 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 754 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 707 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 798 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 756 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 772 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 745 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 715 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 775 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 753 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 762 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 847 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 789 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 788 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 722 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 771 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 795 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 672 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 652 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 702 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 768 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 402 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 803 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 381 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 685 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 732 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 379 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 765 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 687 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 761 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 716 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 721 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 357 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 315 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 738 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 726 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 685 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 720 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 377 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 693 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 338 Views

Reply to Message