Active Users:596 Time:01/01/2026 02:28:50 PM
Re: Logain Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM
Graendal cannot comment later that she killed Asmodean if she is dead by balefire.

There is a theory out there that we might see Asmodean reappear in the series, based on the assumption that Graendal could have been burnt out far enough back to undo Asmodean's death.

The logic goes like this:

1. No character has yet revealed themselves as Asmodean's killer.
2. Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer because she died by balefire.
3. The only possible way to still implicate Graendal as Asmodean's killer is if somehow Asmodean were to reappear in the series (i.e. if Graendal were the killer and she was balefired back far enough, then Asmo might reappear)
4. Because Brandon says it is impossible to burn Graendal out that far back, it is impossible the balefiring of Graendal will cause Asmodean to reappear.
5. Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing).

Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1906 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 849 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 914 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 453 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 891 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 901 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 964 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 949 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 881 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 778 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 767 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 800 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 791 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 793 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 743 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 833 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 789 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 812 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 792 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 758 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 808 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 803 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 812 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 881 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 852 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 820 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 754 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 817 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 857 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 722 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 688 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 752 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 807 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 417 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 850 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 400 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 724 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 772 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 400 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 807 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 717 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 793 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 766 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 756 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 376 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 337 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 778 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 774 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 720 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 760 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 403 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 747 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 360 Views

Reply to Message