Active Users:1118 Time:23/02/2025 06:05:05 AM
Re: Logain Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM
Graendal cannot comment later that she killed Asmodean if she is dead by balefire.

There is a theory out there that we might see Asmodean reappear in the series, based on the assumption that Graendal could have been burnt out far enough back to undo Asmodean's death.

The logic goes like this:

1. No character has yet revealed themselves as Asmodean's killer.
2. Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer because she died by balefire.
3. The only possible way to still implicate Graendal as Asmodean's killer is if somehow Asmodean were to reappear in the series (i.e. if Graendal were the killer and she was balefired back far enough, then Asmo might reappear)
4. Because Brandon says it is impossible to burn Graendal out that far back, it is impossible the balefiring of Graendal will cause Asmodean to reappear.
5. Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing).

Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1719 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 694 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 767 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 362 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 685 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 703 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 815 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 774 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 717 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 605 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 622 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 638 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 642 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 649 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 600 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 686 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 628 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 647 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 630 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 607 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 669 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 635 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 644 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 730 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 677 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 683 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 600 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 642 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 681 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 543 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 544 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 596 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 657 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 339 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 678 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 325 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 572 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 622 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 315 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 625 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 566 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 652 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 601 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 608 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 291 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 272 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 615 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 607 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 562 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 588 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 317 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 575 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 265 Views

Reply to Message