Active Users:929 Time:28/09/2026 09:17:57 PM
Re: Logain Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM
Graendal cannot comment later that she killed Asmodean if she is dead by balefire.

There is a theory out there that we might see Asmodean reappear in the series, based on the assumption that Graendal could have been burnt out far enough back to undo Asmodean's death.

The logic goes like this:

1. No character has yet revealed themselves as Asmodean's killer.
2. Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer because she died by balefire.
3. The only possible way to still implicate Graendal as Asmodean's killer is if somehow Asmodean were to reappear in the series (i.e. if Graendal were the killer and she was balefired back far enough, then Asmo might reappear)
4. Because Brandon says it is impossible to burn Graendal out that far back, it is impossible the balefiring of Graendal will cause Asmodean to reappear.
5. Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing).

Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 2092 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 1027 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 1074 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 544 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 1077 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 1070 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1117 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1097 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 1035 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 943 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 907 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 970 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 949 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 953 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 908 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 983 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 935 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 982 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 955 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 928 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 971 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 975 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 990 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 1073 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 1053 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 978 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 936 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 981 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 1020 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 887 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 864 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 917 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 972 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 486 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 1015 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 477 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 890 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 940 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 478 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 975 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 894 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 949 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 924 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 941 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 457 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 409 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 946 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 930 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 873 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 921 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 476 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 903 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 445 Views

Reply to Message