Active Users:1157 Time:22/11/2024 08:19:27 PM
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM
Basically, you can't prove that there is a connection between how Graendal died and how Asmodean died, especially since it seems no amount of balefire can remove a month or more from the Pattern. Rand used an incredible amount of saidin, more than anyone else could use unaided, and all he could manage was 15 minutes burned from the Pattern. Basically, Asmodean wouldn't come back even if Graendal was hit with balefire because he was killed too long ago.

And, even moreso, B.S. says nothing about the identity of Asmodean's killer.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1654 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 632 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 702 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 335 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 612 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 641 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 749 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 699 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 654 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 563 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 551 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 570 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 578 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 571 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 529 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 612 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 563 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 580 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 556 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 533 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 597 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 570 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 567 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 654 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 637 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 608 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 494 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 568 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 612 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 484 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 483 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 529 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 590 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 307 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 617 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 298 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 506 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 553 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 283 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 553 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 499 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 584 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 541 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 538 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 261 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 241 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 542 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 537 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 494 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 521 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 286 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 504 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 237 Views

Reply to Message