Active Users:280 Time:03/04/2025 11:05:40 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Why? Naiowen Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM
How does this take Graendal out of the running for being Asmodean's killer? Just because she was balefired? Asmo's death happened months ago so Graendal being balefired would have no effect on Asmodean's death if she was the killer.

And I'm not saying I believe that she's the killer, but the logic here is mystifying.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1737 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 708 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 781 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 369 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 696 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 721 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 830 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 787 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 733 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 619 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 633 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 653 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 652 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 661 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 618 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 700 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 643 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 658 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 641 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 619 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 680 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 650 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 657 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 743 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 690 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 698 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 616 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 657 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 591 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 657 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 664 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 692 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 558 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 555 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 610 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 669 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 342 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 558 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 689 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 330 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 588 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 312 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 637 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 320 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 644 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 577 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 669 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 614 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 621 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 327 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 298 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 278 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 610 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 630 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 622 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 576 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 606 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 322 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 585 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 312 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 586 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 271 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes