Active Users:414 Time:27/04/2025 11:08:07 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Why? Naiowen Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM
How does this take Graendal out of the running for being Asmodean's killer? Just because she was balefired? Asmo's death happened months ago so Graendal being balefired would have no effect on Asmodean's death if she was the killer.

And I'm not saying I believe that she's the killer, but the logic here is mystifying.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1744 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 718 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 787 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 373 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 709 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 728 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 838 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 794 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 739 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 625 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 643 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 659 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 660 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 670 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 624 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 705 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 650 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 664 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 649 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 628 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 687 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 655 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 665 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 749 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 700 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 704 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 623 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 661 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 597 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 664 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 671 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 702 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 567 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 563 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 618 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 674 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 345 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 564 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 696 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 332 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 593 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 314 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 644 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 324 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 657 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 584 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 675 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 622 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 628 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 330 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 300 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 281 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 618 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 638 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 629 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 581 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 614 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 325 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 593 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 315 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 597 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 274 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes