Active Users:777 Time:23/12/2024 04:41:21 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Why? Naiowen Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM
How does this take Graendal out of the running for being Asmodean's killer? Just because she was balefired? Asmo's death happened months ago so Graendal being balefired would have no effect on Asmodean's death if she was the killer.

And I'm not saying I believe that she's the killer, but the logic here is mystifying.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1663 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 640 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 717 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 339 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 619 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 652 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 757 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 706 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 662 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 575 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 558 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 580 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 585 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 585 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 539 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 621 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 575 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 590 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 566 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 544 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 605 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 582 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 581 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 670 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 647 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 625 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 513 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 581 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 523 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 573 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 587 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 619 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 490 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 490 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 538 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 601 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 312 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 481 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 626 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 303 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 516 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 292 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 565 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 289 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 564 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 508 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 595 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 551 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 549 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 296 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 267 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 246 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 539 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 554 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 551 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 506 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 534 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 294 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 516 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 282 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 514 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 241 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes