Active Users:2955 Time:22/01/2025 11:36:01 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM
... I saw hints that she may very well have. He basically stated that even with the power of the Choedan Kal, Rand could not have possibly balefired her hard enough to erase her back before she would have theoretically killed Asmodean, so he wouldn't have reappeared afterward anyway.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1683 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 659 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 734 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 346 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 645 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 672 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 779 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 737 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 679 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 589 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 580 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 602 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 606 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 612 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 566 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 644 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 596 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 612 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 590 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 567 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 630 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 603 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 607 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 693 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 659 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 642 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 567 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 601 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 545 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 601 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 612 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 647 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 513 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 512 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 557 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 621 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 320 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 506 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 647 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 309 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 537 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 298 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 585 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 298 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 589 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 526 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 614 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 571 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 571 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 306 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 277 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 253 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 563 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 575 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 573 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 530 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 554 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 301 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 538 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 292 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 540 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 249 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes