Active Users:575 Time:22/02/2025 10:20:13 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM
... I saw hints that she may very well have. He basically stated that even with the power of the Choedan Kal, Rand could not have possibly balefired her hard enough to erase her back before she would have theoretically killed Asmodean, so he wouldn't have reappeared afterward anyway.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1718 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 693 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 767 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 361 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 684 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 702 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 814 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 773 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 716 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 604 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 621 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 637 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 641 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 648 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 599 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 685 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 627 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 646 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 629 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 606 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 668 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 634 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 643 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 729 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 676 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 682 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 599 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 641 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 577 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 637 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 650 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 680 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 542 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 543 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 595 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 656 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 338 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 542 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 677 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 324 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 571 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 306 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 621 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 314 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 624 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 565 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 651 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 600 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 608 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 322 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 291 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 271 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 597 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 614 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 606 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 561 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 587 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 316 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 568 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 307 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 574 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 264 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes