Active Users:807 Time:23/02/2025 07:13:39 PM
Yeah, WH Rand was a BAMF. Dark Rand totally would've let Lan fall off that rooftop *NM* mogi67 Send a noteboard - 10/11/2009 06:52:46 PM
Reply to message
Why is Moiraine needed? - 10/11/2009 11:33:06 AM 1522 Views
She totally owes him ten crowns... - 10/11/2009 01:11:07 PM 883 Views
Re: Why is Moiraine needed? - 10/11/2009 01:34:30 PM 912 Views
Re: Why is needed? - 10/11/2009 02:20:17 PM 842 Views
seconded (and Nynaeve or Alivia. I hope Nynaeve) *NM* - 10/11/2009 02:30:07 PM 374 Views
Re: I think it will be Nynaeve too. *NM* - 10/11/2009 02:37:51 PM 342 Views
Re: Why is needed? - 10/11/2009 02:26:25 PM 963 Views
Re: Why is Moiraine needed? - 10/11/2009 02:40:30 PM 767 Views
no Callandor or OP/TP in SG! - 10/11/2009 03:31:01 PM 942 Views
Just because he's learned to laugh doesn't mean he trusts Aes Sedai - 10/11/2009 02:27:53 PM 709 Views
Oh man! but I don't want Rand to revert back to being a total pansy.. He was cool in WH *NM* - 10/11/2009 02:42:04 PM 350 Views
How was he a pansy in FoH? - 10/11/2009 02:45:14 PM 692 Views
Fine, he wasn't a pansy, but I still liked him more in WH - 10/11/2009 03:06:03 PM 717 Views
Yeah, WH Rand was a BAMF. Dark Rand totally would've let Lan fall off that rooftop *NM* - 10/11/2009 06:52:46 PM 357 Views
I always imagined her return to be like Aliya from Lynch's Dune - 10/11/2009 03:08:34 PM 755 Views
She's not - 10/11/2009 03:43:53 PM 784 Views
agreed - I wish she would stay dead and gone *NM* - 10/11/2009 05:54:00 PM 336 Views
This is one place I feel that RJ could have improved the story - 10/11/2009 11:31:51 PM 660 Views
Re: Why is Moiraine needed? - 10/11/2009 04:36:14 PM 778 Views
Re: Why is Moiraine needed? - 10/11/2009 05:15:16 PM 849 Views
Re: Why is Moiraine needed? - 12/11/2009 02:26:38 AM 762 Views
Perhaps there is more than one reason... - 10/11/2009 06:06:09 PM 866 Views
Re: Perhaps there is more than one reason... - 10/11/2009 06:35:07 PM 725 Views
Re: Why is Moiraine needed? - 10/11/2009 07:35:10 PM 666 Views
Guilt - 10/11/2009 10:29:39 PM 778 Views

Reply to Message