It's hard to convey emotion through a board post, so I want you to read this, and focus your imagination:
See that ellipsis up there? That's my reaction. Imagine we're sitting at a coffee table. You just spoke. I spend the next 45 seconds staring at you. My expression flickers, from surprise, to disbelief, to exasperation, finally setting on a sort of low-level disdain.
The silence continues. You cough, once, hoping to break the lull, but this just focuses my stare even more. It's as if I am trying to commit your face to memory, never to forget the person who says the things you do. Or maybe I'm just trying to set you on fire with my brain.
See that ellipsis up there? That's my reaction. Imagine we're sitting at a coffee table. You just spoke. I spend the next 45 seconds staring at you. My expression flickers, from surprise, to disbelief, to exasperation, finally setting on a sort of low-level disdain.
The silence continues. You cough, once, hoping to break the lull, but this just focuses my stare even more. It's as if I am trying to commit your face to memory, never to forget the person who says the things you do. Or maybe I'm just trying to set you on fire with my brain.
You do not like my theories. It is your right and I am not against it. I always enjoy diferrent opinion and I like disscussion.
I am reading WoT and commenting it for fun. I can be wrong or right, I can write in good or poor English (it is not my mother tongue), sometime I do not precisely express my opinions, but I write only for fun. And sometime I am not very serious.
But you think that because what I am writing, you can treat me as your personal enemy. I am not yours. You believe, that you know me. You do not. But you hate me. It is ridiculus.
Robert Jordan or Brandon Sanderson presented twisted emotions in the last book: "He could have killed [...] with his own hands! Twist that too-thick bull's neck in his fingers, twist it around, squeezing, feeling the bones crack, the flesh wring, the breath stop." (tGS, Prologue, "What the Storm Means", p.45). Good that yours emotions to me are not so hot.
Keep cool and be nice, boy.
Curie Sedai
This message last edited by Curie on 10/11/2009 at 10:52:56 AM
Min's riddle
- 08/11/2009 02:45:09 PM
2083 Views
Re: Min's riddle
- 08/11/2009 03:20:53 PM
897 Views
That third isn't so mysterious
- 08/11/2009 04:45:31 PM
900 Views
Re: That third isn't so mysterious
- 08/11/2009 04:47:10 PM
870 Views
It was stated explicitly that the third person is Moridin.
- 08/11/2009 05:19:16 PM
885 Views
Re: It was stated explicitly that the third person is Moridin.
- 08/11/2009 06:33:22 PM
887 Views
Wrong again. Pages 235-236 in The Gathering Storm are very clear about this.
- 08/11/2009 10:31:13 PM
1008 Views
Re: Wrong again. Pages 235-236 in The Gathering Storm are very clear about this.
- 08/11/2009 11:01:53 PM
974 Views
Well, if you want to pull ideas out of your ass there's no way to debate anything.
- 08/11/2009 11:35:43 PM
847 Views
I think you shold know that you are a boor. Bye. *NM*
- 08/11/2009 11:47:54 PM
433 Views
I was more polite to you and your silly theories than you deserved.
- 09/11/2009 01:32:30 AM
756 Views
Nowhere does it state that Moridin is the third. Just one of EIGHT people in Rand's head.
- 25/11/2009 08:27:31 AM
1316 Views
It's been known for... a long time, but like Tom says, it was actually stated in tGS *NM*
- 08/11/2009 06:04:46 PM
554 Views
Min's 
riddle is perhaps solved
- 08/11/2009 03:43:27 PM
1179 Views
riddle is perhaps solved
- 08/11/2009 03:43:27 PM
1179 Views
Hmmm. Not agreeing or disagreeing...but Min had a "Melting" viewing before
- 08/11/2009 08:34:36 PM
878 Views
Three things...
- 08/11/2009 08:40:37 PM
1175 Views
Uh...Hello...Ilyena...Elayne...see any similarity?
- 09/11/2009 05:37:45 AM
797 Views
You have some far-out theories and seem to think I’m retarded for not thinking the same
- 09/11/2009 10:16:51 AM
827 Views
I didn't "seem" to think it until now. I was AGREEING with you.
- 09/11/2009 03:02:15 PM
694 Views
I don't see how when I disagree with about everything you said
- 09/11/2009 11:40:19 PM
625 Views
Well, ultimately I couldn't care less what you think. Goodbye. *NM*
- 10/11/2009 03:13:09 AM
403 Views
Eh, there's no evidence of that, other than an abundance of vowels in their name.
- 10/11/2009 06:49:58 AM
694 Views
, 
and 
*NM*
Answer to Crackbranded Asha' man: Where has it ever been shown that Taim is gay?
- 09/11/2009 06:25:42 PM
1047 Views
So... everyone pointing out how terrible this theory is in your original post hasn't disuaded you?
- 09/11/2009 04:47:25 AM
739 Views
Re: So... everyone pointing out how terrible this theory is ...
- 10/11/2009 12:03:02 PM
755 Views
Well, actually- yes! The LTT/Rand thing IS creepy.
- 10/11/2009 04:33:02 PM
931 Views
Channelling sickness, pregnancy-induced difficulty with weaving...
- 08/11/2009 03:53:26 PM
807 Views
Rand + Avi + Elayne = Three Channelers.
- 08/11/2009 05:59:34 PM
669 Views
Do you think, that channeling is cool?
- 08/11/2009 07:46:18 PM
788 Views
We're running out of time for the main characters to not start figuring things out.
- 08/11/2009 10:33:34 PM
614 Views
The riddle was simply a clue about safely using callandor. Nothing else.
- 09/11/2009 12:45:49 AM
829 Views
Too simple and obvious. *NM*
- 08/11/2009 07:56:05 PM
366 Views
Appearantly it wasn't obvious...
- 09/11/2009 12:51:07 AM
671 Views
Well... readers have always been better at figuring out the prophecies than characters
- 09/11/2009 04:56:23 AM
839 Views
But readers get the filtered bits and pieces. The characters have access to whole reams of works.
- 14/11/2009 03:25:50 PM
668 Views
I know- that's my point. It's a lot harder to pick things out for them
- 14/11/2009 06:47:07 PM
760 Views
Re: Min's riddle
- 08/11/2009 09:24:11 PM
898 Views
It's a possibility.
- 09/11/2009 04:59:33 AM
1159 Views
I can see this as a definite possibility
- 09/11/2009 10:12:23 PM
678 Views
It'd be more like David knocking out Goliath by making him punch himself in the face
- 10/11/2009 06:58:16 AM
722 Views
So why...
- 10/11/2009 10:14:38 AM
595 Views
The Dark One is sentient; the CK is just a tool *NM*
- 10/11/2009 04:33:52 PM
308 Views
True, but it wouldn't be the first time in this series... *NM*
- 10/11/2009 09:34:19 PM
415 Views
My point was that you can't really compare it to destroying the CK- it's a totally different
- 11/11/2009 07:02:54 AM
700 Views
How about LTT (loud voice), Old Rand (tiny voice), and New Rand? They have already become "one" *NM*
- 04/12/2009 06:32:20 AM
436 Views