I'm led to believe that they are a one-time use thing
Yvves Send a noteboard - 07/11/2009 11:46:19 PM
Because if the people wearing them are meant to die to let others escape from a raid, then the remains of those you raided would now have the rings to use in a future raid against you. Doesn't sound like much of an advantage, really, if it just bloody switches sides at the end of the battle.
Bloodknives survey
05/11/2009 02:32:07 PM
- 912 Views
Hm. Well, we know that Seancean have at least a bit of ter'angreal making capacity
05/11/2009 02:47:42 PM
- 588 Views
There was a Q&A on this matter
05/11/2009 03:10:44 PM
- 705 Views
I'm guessing they don't think of the a'dam as a ter'angreal...
05/11/2009 03:18:11 PM
- 575 Views
I'm led to believe that they are a one-time use thing
07/11/2009 11:46:19 PM
- 447 Views
that presumes that people will know the ter'angreal is the ring. Perhaps only the royals know that *NM*
08/11/2009 08:48:04 AM
- 178 Views